Marvin Harrison Jr. or Stefon Diggs?

Who to start in Week 5, who is better for the rest of the season, and who carries more trade value — from the FantasyPros expert consensus and the LeagueLogs Market Index.

Week 5 · 2026 season · Consensus updated October 8 at 6:11 PM EDT

Connect your league and an AI analyst settles debates like this one against your actual roster.

The lean

  • This week: Stefon Diggs
  • Rest of season: Stefon Diggs — 8 of 8 experts
  • Trade value: Stefon Diggs

All three measures favor the same player. Your scoring, lineup and matchup still matter.

Marvin Harrison Jr.Stefon Diggs
Rest of season
0 of 8 experts rank Marvin Harrison Jr. ahead · 8 rank Stefon Diggs ahead
WR52#45–#64WR35#31–#37edge
Week 5WR43#36–#55WR25#18–#37edge
Week 5 projection (PPR)8.110.8edge
Market Index value (redraft PPR)9 #100 overall13 #66 overalledge
Last 30 days (Market Index)-34 ranks · -407 val+23 ranks · +307 val
Rostered70%87%
Bye147
StatusNo injury designationQUESTIONABLE (Hamstring) · DNP → DNP · 0.09484% to play

Expert consensus and ownership data via FantasyPros · Market Index values by LeagueLogs

Go deeper

More comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Who should I start in Week 5, Marvin Harrison Jr. or Stefon Diggs?
Stefon Diggs. This week's consensus has Marvin Harrison Jr. at WR43 (range #36–#55) and Stefon Diggs at WR25 (range #18–#37). Projections: 8.1 vs 10.8 PPR points.
Who is better for the rest of the season, Marvin Harrison Jr. or Stefon Diggs?
Stefon Diggs. Rest-of-season consensus: Marvin Harrison Jr. WR52 (range #45–#64) vs Stefon Diggs WR35 (range #31–#37). 8 of 8 FantasyPros experts who rank both have Stefon Diggs ahead for the rest of the season.
Should I trade Marvin Harrison Jr. for Stefon Diggs?
On the LeagueLogs Market Index (redraft PPR) Marvin Harrison Jr. is ranked #100 overall and Stefon Diggs #66, so Stefon Diggs carries more trade value and a one-for-one favors the side receiving him. Run the exact deal through the free AI Trade Analyzer for a verdict on your league's scoring.