Jakobi Meyers or Marvin Harrison Jr.?

Who to start in Week 3, who is better for the rest of the season, and who carries more trade value — from the FantasyPros expert consensus and the LeagueLogs Market Index.

Week 3 · 2026 season · Consensus updated September 22 at 6:11 AM EDT

Connect your league and an AI analyst settles debates like this one against your actual roster.

The lean

  • This week: Jakobi Meyers
  • Rest of season: Jakobi Meyers2 of 4 experts
  • Trade value: Marvin Harrison Jr.

The weekly, season-long and trade-value calls differ. Choose the measure that fits your decision.

Jakobi MeyersMarvin Harrison Jr.
Rest of season
2 of 4 experts rank Jakobi Meyers ahead · 2 rank Marvin Harrison Jr. ahead
WR48#46–#51edgeWR50#31–#70
Week 3WR41#38–#50edgeWR44#42–#49
Week 3 projection (PPR)10.0edge8.3
Market Index value (redraft PPR)8 #113 overall13 #66 overalledge
Last 30 days (Market Index)-10 ranks · -71 val+2 ranks · +34 val
Rostered67%89%
Bye714
StatusNo injury designationNo injury designation

Expert consensus and ownership data via FantasyPros · Market Index values by LeagueLogs

Go deeper

More comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Who should I start in Week 3, Jakobi Meyers or Marvin Harrison Jr.?
Jakobi Meyers. This week's consensus has Jakobi Meyers at WR41 (range #38–#50) and Marvin Harrison Jr. at WR44 (range #42–#49). Projections: 10.0 vs 8.3 PPR points.
Who is better for the rest of the season, Jakobi Meyers or Marvin Harrison Jr.?
Jakobi Meyers. Rest-of-season consensus: Jakobi Meyers WR48 (range #46–#51) vs Marvin Harrison Jr. WR50 (range #31–#70). 2 of 4 FantasyPros experts who rank both have Jakobi Meyers ahead for the rest of the season.
Should I trade Jakobi Meyers for Marvin Harrison Jr.?
On the LeagueLogs Market Index (redraft PPR) Jakobi Meyers is ranked #113 overall and Marvin Harrison Jr. #66, so Marvin Harrison Jr. carries more trade value and a one-for-one favors the side receiving him. Run the exact deal through the free AI Trade Analyzer for a verdict on your league's scoring.