Week 4 TE Rankings
Week 4 expert consensus TE rankings for every scoring format — pick PPR, Half PPR or Standard, or scan the top of each board below.
Week 4 · 2026 season · Consensus updated October 6, 2026 at 12:11 AM EDT
Connect your league for start/sit calls and waiver advice from an AI analyst that knows your actual roster.
| # | Player | Pos | Team | Consensus | Best | Worst |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Brock Bowers | TE | LV | 1.2 | 1 | 2 |
| 2 | Trey McBride | TE | ARI | 1.8 | 1 | 3 |
| 3 | George Kittle | TE | SF | 3.3 | 3 | 6 |
| 4 | Tyler Warren | TE | IND | 4.0 | 3 | 6 |
| 5 | Travis Kelce | TE | KC | 5.3 | 4 | 9 |
| 6 | Dalton Kincaid | TE | BUF | 6.1 | 4 | 8 |
| 7 | Sam LaPorta | TE | DET | 7.6 | 6 | 10 |
| 8 | Juwan Johnson | TE | NO | 7.6 | 5 | 12 |
| 9 | Harold Fannin Jr. | TE | CLE | 10.3 | 8 | 14 |
| 10 | Isaiah Likely | TE | NYG | 10.8 | 7 | 15 |
Half PPR
Full Half PPR board →| # | Player | Pos | Team | Consensus | Best | Worst |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Brock Bowers | TE | LV | 1.2 | 1 | 2 |
| 2 | Trey McBride | TE | ARI | 1.8 | 1 | 3 |
| 3 | George Kittle | TE | SF | 3.3 | 3 | 5 |
| 4 | Tyler Warren | TE | IND | 4.0 | 3 | 6 |
| 5 | Dalton Kincaid | TE | BUF | 5.3 | 4 | 7 |
| 6 | Travis Kelce | TE | KC | 5.8 | 4 | 9 |
| 7 | Sam LaPorta | TE | DET | 7.3 | 6 | 9 |
| 8 | Juwan Johnson | TE | NO | 8.4 | 5 | 13 |
| 9 | Tucker Kraft | TE | GB | 9.9 | 7 | 15 |
| 10 | Isaiah Likely | TE | NYG | 10.6 | 7 | 15 |
Standard
Full Standard board →| # | Player | Pos | Team | Consensus | Best | Worst |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Brock Bowers | TE | LV | 1.0 | 1 | 1 |
| 2 | Trey McBride | TE | ARI | 2.0 | 2 | 3 |
| 3 | George Kittle | TE | SF | 3.3 | 3 | 5 |
| 4 | Tyler Warren | TE | IND | 4.5 | 3 | 7 |
| 5 | Dalton Kincaid | TE | BUF | 4.5 | 4 | 6 |
| 6 | Sam LaPorta | TE | DET | 6.7 | 5 | 9 |
| 7 | Tucker Kraft | TE | GB | 7.4 | 6 | 13 |
| 8 | Travis Kelce | TE | KC | 7.9 | 4 | 10 |
| 9 | Juwan Johnson | TE | NO | 10.0 | 7 | 12 |
| 10 | Isaiah Likely | TE | NYG | 10.5 | 6 | 14 |
Expert consensus and ownership data via FantasyPros
Week 4: where the experts split
The widest expert disagreements near the top of the board — the players one analyst has as a must-start and another has on the bench.
- #38Davis AllenTE · LARbest #36 · worst #57 · ±5.4
- #37Jeremy RuckertTE · NYJbest #35 · worst #56 · ±4.9
- #34Chig OkonkwoTE · WASbest #19 · worst #35 · ±4.2
- #40Noah GrayTE · KCbest #40 · worst #56 · ±4.0
- #16T.J. HockensonTE · MINbest #7 · worst #21 · ±3.2
Want to use these values for your roster? Try the free AI Trade Analyzer or the AI Trade Finder— both run on the same Market Index.
Weekly decision guides
Related rankings
Frequently Asked Questions
- Do TE rankings change with scoring format?
- Yes — reception value shifts the order. Full-point PPR pushes pass-catching players up the board, Standard pushes them down, and Half PPR sits in between. Pick the board that matches your league's scoring settings; if you're not sure, most leagues today run PPR or Half PPR.
- What are week 4 fantasy football rankings?
- Week 4 rankings order players by expected fantasy points in this week's games only — matchup, injury status and role all count, season-long value does not. They are the board to check before you set a lineup.
- What does the best / worst rank mean?
- Every row shows the consensus rank plus the highest and lowest rank any contributing FantasyPros expert gave the player this week. A wide gap means the experts disagree — usually an injury question, a new role, or a matchup they read differently.
- Should I start the higher-ranked player?
- Usually, but rankings are league-agnostic. Scoring settings, your other options at the position and your opponent all matter. Connect your league to LeagueLogs — it's free — and the AI chat that knows your league answers start/sit questions against your actual roster.