Rashod Bateman or Tre' Harris?
Who to start in Week 5, who is better for the rest of the season, and who carries more trade value — from the FantasyPros expert consensus and the LeagueLogs Market Index.
Week 5 · 2026 season · Consensus updated October 8 at 6:11 PM EDT
Connect your league and an AI analyst settles debates like this one against your actual roster.
The lean
- This week: Tre' Harris
- Rest of season: Tre' Harris — 6 of 7 experts
- Trade value: Tre' Harris
All three measures favor the same player. Your scoring, lineup and matchup still matter.
| Rashod Bateman | Tre' Harris | |
|---|---|---|
| Rest of season 1 of 7 experts rank Rashod Bateman ahead · 6 rank Tre' Harris ahead | WR72#66–#80 | WR59#55–#64edge |
| Week 5 | WR62#51–#80 | WR44#34–#57edge |
| Week 5 projection (PPR) | 6.1 | 8.5edge |
| Market Index value (redraft PPR) | 5 #182 overall | 7 #122 overalledge |
| Last 30 days (Market Index) | +50 ranks · +102 val | +52 ranks · +208 val |
| Rostered | 23% | 13% |
| Bye | 13 | 7 |
| Status | No injury designation | No injury designation |
Expert consensus and ownership data via FantasyPros · Market Index values by LeagueLogs
Go deeper
More comparisons
Frequently Asked Questions
- Who should I start in Week 5, Rashod Bateman or Tre' Harris?
- Tre' Harris. This week's consensus has Rashod Bateman at WR62 (range #51–#80) and Tre' Harris at WR44 (range #34–#57). Projections: 6.1 vs 8.5 PPR points.
- Who is better for the rest of the season, Rashod Bateman or Tre' Harris?
- Tre' Harris. Rest-of-season consensus: Rashod Bateman WR72 (range #66–#80) vs Tre' Harris WR59 (range #55–#64). 6 of 7 FantasyPros experts who rank both have Tre' Harris ahead for the rest of the season.
- Should I trade Rashod Bateman for Tre' Harris?
- On the LeagueLogs Market Index (redraft PPR) Rashod Bateman is ranked #182 overall and Tre' Harris #122, so Tre' Harris carries more trade value and a one-for-one favors the side receiving him. Run the exact deal through the free AI Trade Analyzer for a verdict on your league's scoring.