Michael Wilson or Quentin Johnston?

Who to start in Week 6, who is better for the rest of the season, and who carries more trade value — from the FantasyPros expert consensus and the LeagueLogs Market Index.

Week 6 · 2026 season · Consensus updated October 15 at 6:11 AM EDT

Connect your league and an AI analyst settles debates like this one against your actual roster.

The lean

  • This week: Michael Wilson
  • Rest of season: Michael Wilson — 5 of 5 experts
  • Trade value: Michael Wilson

All three measures favor the same player. Your scoring, lineup and matchup still matter.

Michael WilsonQuentin Johnston
Rest of season
5 of 5 experts rank Michael Wilson ahead · 0 rank Quentin Johnston ahead
WR22#17–#29edgeWR60#48–#69
Week 6WR17#15–#22edgeWR94#70–#154
Week 6 projection (PPR)12.5edge7.0
Market Index value (redraft PPR)19 #42 overalledge7 #132 overall
Last 30 days (Market Index)+44 ranks · +898 val-42 ranks · -291 val
Rostered94%54%
Bye147
StatusNo injury designationQUESTIONABLE (Chest) · LIMIT · 0.61807% to play

Expert consensus and ownership data via FantasyPros · Market Index values by LeagueLogs

Go deeper

More comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Who should I start in Week 6, Michael Wilson or Quentin Johnston?
Michael Wilson. This week's consensus has Michael Wilson at WR17 (range #15–#22) and Quentin Johnston at WR94 (range #70–#154). Projections: 12.5 vs 7.0 PPR points.
Who is better for the rest of the season, Michael Wilson or Quentin Johnston?
Michael Wilson. Rest-of-season consensus: Michael Wilson WR22 (range #17–#29) vs Quentin Johnston WR60 (range #48–#69). 5 of 5 FantasyPros experts who rank both have Michael Wilson ahead for the rest of the season.
Should I trade Michael Wilson for Quentin Johnston?
On the LeagueLogs Market Index (redraft PPR) Michael Wilson is ranked #42 overall and Quentin Johnston #132, so Michael Wilson carries more trade value and a one-for-one favors the side receiving him. Run the exact deal through the free AI Trade Analyzer for a verdict on your league's scoring.