Jonathon Brooks or Michael Wilson?
Who to start in Week 1, who is better for the rest of the season, and who carries more trade value — from the FantasyPros expert consensus and the LeagueLogs Market Index.
Week 1 · 2026 season · Consensus updated September 3 at 1:20 PM EDT
Connect your league and an AI analyst settles debates like this one against your actual roster.
The lean
- This week: Michael Wilson
- Rest of season: even on the consensus — 68 of 113 experts
- Trade value: close to even
The horizons disagree, which is exactly when your roster context decides it.
| Jonathon Brooks | Michael Wilson | |
|---|---|---|
| Rest of season (overall) 68 of 113 experts rank Jonathon Brooks ahead · 45 rank Michael Wilson ahead | #88#56–#177 | #88#55–#131 |
| Week 1 (flex) | FLX92#51–#122 | FLX76#66–#98edge |
| Week 1 projection (PPR) | 10.3 | 10.4 |
| Market Index value (redraft PPR) | 10 #88 overall | 10 #87 overall |
| Rostered | 86% | 88% |
| Bye | 5 | 14 |
| Status | No injury designation | No injury designation |
Expert consensus and ownership data via FantasyPros · Market Index values by LeagueLogs
Go deeper
More comparisons
Frequently Asked Questions
- Who should I start in Week 1, Jonathon Brooks or Michael Wilson?
- Michael Wilson. This week's consensus has Jonathon Brooks at RB34 (range #22–#43) and Michael Wilson at WR40 (range #34–#50); on the flex board it is #92 vs #76. Projections: 10.3 vs 10.4 PPR points.
- Who is better for the rest of the season, Jonathon Brooks or Michael Wilson?
- The experts have them effectively even for the rest of the season: Jonathon Brooks RB31 (range #22–#58) vs Michael Wilson WR40 (range #28–#52). 68 of 113 FantasyPros experts who rank both have Jonathon Brooks ahead for the rest of the season.
- Should I trade Jonathon Brooks for Michael Wilson?
- On the LeagueLogs Market Index (redraft PPR) Jonathon Brooks is ranked #88 overall and Michael Wilson #87, so a one-for-one is close to even. Run the exact deal through the free AI Trade Analyzer for a verdict on your league's scoring.