Gunnar Helm or Mason Taylor?

Who to start in Week 7, who is better for the rest of the season, and who carries more trade value — from the FantasyPros expert consensus and the LeagueLogs Market Index.

Week 7 · 2026 season · Consensus updated October 22 at 12:11 PM EDT

Connect your league and an AI analyst settles debates like this one against your actual roster.

The lean

  • This week: Mason Taylor
  • Rest of season: Mason Taylor — 3 of 4 experts
  • Trade value: close to even

At least one measure is close to even. Your scoring, lineup and matchup can help separate them.

Gunnar HelmMason Taylor
Rest of season
1 of 4 experts rank Gunnar Helm ahead · 3 rank Mason Taylor ahead
TE40#36–#45TE38#32–#45edge
Week 7TE35#34–#38TE29#27–#30edge
Week 7 projection (PPR)4.24.9
Market Index value (redraft PPR)3 #257 overall4 #246 overall
Last 30 days (Market Index)-24 ranks · -35 val+52 ranks · +62 val
Rostered3%2%
Bye913
StatusNo injury designationNo injury designation

Expert consensus and ownership data via FantasyPros · Market Index values by LeagueLogs

Comparing a trade rather than a lineup choice? Check both sides of the offer with the AI Trade Analyzer, or review your Sleeper roster’s strengths and weaknesses.

Go deeper

More comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Who should I start in Week 7, Gunnar Helm or Mason Taylor?
Mason Taylor. This week's consensus has Gunnar Helm at TE35 (range #34–#38) and Mason Taylor at TE29 (range #27–#30). Projections: 4.2 vs 4.9 PPR points.
Who is better for the rest of the season, Gunnar Helm or Mason Taylor?
Mason Taylor. Rest-of-season consensus: Gunnar Helm TE40 (range #36–#45) vs Mason Taylor TE38 (range #32–#45). 3 of 4 FantasyPros experts who rank both have Mason Taylor ahead for the rest of the season.
Should I trade Gunnar Helm for Mason Taylor?
On the LeagueLogs Market Index (redraft PPR) Gunnar Helm is ranked #257 overall and Mason Taylor #246, so a one-for-one is close to even. Run the exact deal through the free AI Trade Analyzer for a verdict on your league's scoring.