Evan Engram or Mason Taylor?

Who to start in Week 7, who is better for the rest of the season, and who carries more trade value — from the FantasyPros expert consensus and the LeagueLogs Market Index.

Week 7 · 2026 season · Consensus updated October 22 at 12:11 PM EDT

Connect your league and an AI analyst settles debates like this one against your actual roster.

The lean

  • This week: Evan Engram
  • Rest of season: Evan Engram — 3 of 4 experts
  • Trade value: close to even

At least one measure is close to even. Your scoring, lineup and matchup can help separate them.

Evan EngramMason Taylor
Rest of season
3 of 4 experts rank Evan Engram ahead · 1 rank Mason Taylor ahead
TE34#30–#37edgeTE38#32–#45
Week 7TE28#27–#29edgeTE29#27–#30
Week 7 projection (PPR)6.1edge4.9
Market Index value (redraft PPR)4 #216 overall4 #246 overall
Last 30 days (Market Index)+45 ranks · +69 val+52 ranks · +62 val
Rostered4%2%
Bye1013
StatusNo injury designationNo injury designation

Expert consensus and ownership data via FantasyPros · Market Index values by LeagueLogs

Comparing a trade rather than a lineup choice? Check both sides of the offer with the AI Trade Analyzer, or review your Sleeper roster’s strengths and weaknesses.

Go deeper

More comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Who should I start in Week 7, Evan Engram or Mason Taylor?
Evan Engram. This week's consensus has Evan Engram at TE28 (range #27–#29) and Mason Taylor at TE29 (range #27–#30). Projections: 6.1 vs 4.9 PPR points.
Who is better for the rest of the season, Evan Engram or Mason Taylor?
Evan Engram. Rest-of-season consensus: Evan Engram TE34 (range #30–#37) vs Mason Taylor TE38 (range #32–#45). 3 of 4 FantasyPros experts who rank both have Evan Engram ahead for the rest of the season.
Should I trade Evan Engram for Mason Taylor?
On the LeagueLogs Market Index (redraft PPR) Evan Engram is ranked #216 overall and Mason Taylor #246, so a one-for-one is close to even. Run the exact deal through the free AI Trade Analyzer for a verdict on your league's scoring.