DeVonta Smith or Javonte Williams?

Who to start in Week 3, who is better for the rest of the season, and who carries more trade value — from the FantasyPros expert consensus and the LeagueLogs Market Index.

Week 3 · 2026 season · Consensus updated September 22 at 6:11 AM EDT

Connect your league and an AI analyst settles debates like this one against your actual roster.

The lean

  • This week: DeVonta Smith
  • Rest of season: DeVonta Smith2 of 4 experts
  • Trade value: DeVonta Smith

All three measures favor the same player. Your scoring, lineup and matchup still matter.

DeVonta SmithJavonte Williams
Rest of season (overall)
2 of 4 experts rank DeVonta Smith ahead · 2 rank Javonte Williams ahead
#28#20–#31edge#34#15–#51
Week 3 (flex)FLX17#14–#21edgeFLX27#24–#30
Week 3 projection (PPR)15.415.6
Market Index value (redraft PPR)33 #21 overalledge19 #41 overall
Last 30 days (Market Index)+2 ranks · +211 val+2 ranks · +77 val
Rostered99%99%
Bye1014
StatusNo injury designationNo injury designation

Expert consensus and ownership data via FantasyPros · Market Index values by LeagueLogs

Go deeper

More comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Who should I start in Week 3, DeVonta Smith or Javonte Williams?
DeVonta Smith. This week's consensus has DeVonta Smith at WR9 (range #7–#10) and Javonte Williams at RB12 (range #10–#13); on the flex board it is #17 vs #27. Projections: 15.4 vs 15.6 PPR points.
Who is better for the rest of the season, DeVonta Smith or Javonte Williams?
DeVonta Smith. Rest-of-season consensus: DeVonta Smith WR13 (range #10–#14) vs Javonte Williams RB14 (range #8–#18). 2 of 4 FantasyPros experts who rank both have DeVonta Smith ahead for the rest of the season.
Should I trade DeVonta Smith for Javonte Williams?
On the LeagueLogs Market Index (redraft PPR) DeVonta Smith is ranked #21 overall and Javonte Williams #41, so DeVonta Smith carries more trade value and a one-for-one favors the side receiving him. Run the exact deal through the free AI Trade Analyzer for a verdict on your league's scoring.