Courtland Sutton or Josh Downs?
Who to start in Week 5, who is better for the rest of the season, and who carries more trade value — from the FantasyPros expert consensus and the LeagueLogs Market Index.
Week 5 · 2026 season · Consensus updated October 12 at 12:11 PM EDT
Connect your league and an AI analyst settles debates like this one against your actual roster.
The lean
- This week: Josh Downs
- Rest of season: Josh Downs — 5 of 6 experts
- Trade value: Josh Downs
All three measures favor the same player. Your scoring, lineup and matchup still matter.
| Courtland Sutton | Josh Downs | |
|---|---|---|
| Rest of season 1 of 6 experts rank Courtland Sutton ahead · 5 rank Josh Downs ahead | WR47#43–#52 | WR32#24–#35edge |
| Week 5 | WR42#32–#49 | WR23#20–#35edge |
| Week 5 projection (PPR) | 9.3 | 12.1edge |
| Market Index value (redraft PPR) | 10 #84 overall | 13 #64 overalledge |
| Last 30 days (Market Index) | 0 ranks · 0 val | +21 ranks · +300 val |
| Rostered | 72% | 83% |
| Bye | 10 | 13 |
| Status | No injury designation | No injury designation |
Expert consensus and ownership data via FantasyPros · Market Index values by LeagueLogs
Go deeper
More comparisons
Frequently Asked Questions
- Who should I start in Week 5, Courtland Sutton or Josh Downs?
- Josh Downs. This week's consensus has Courtland Sutton at WR42 (range #32–#49) and Josh Downs at WR23 (range #20–#35). Projections: 9.3 vs 12.1 PPR points.
- Who is better for the rest of the season, Courtland Sutton or Josh Downs?
- Josh Downs. Rest-of-season consensus: Courtland Sutton WR47 (range #43–#52) vs Josh Downs WR32 (range #24–#35). 5 of 6 FantasyPros experts who rank both have Josh Downs ahead for the rest of the season.
- Should I trade Courtland Sutton for Josh Downs?
- On the LeagueLogs Market Index (redraft PPR) Courtland Sutton is ranked #84 overall and Josh Downs #64, so Josh Downs carries more trade value and a one-for-one favors the side receiving him. Run the exact deal through the free AI Trade Analyzer for a verdict on your league's scoring.