Chimere Dike or Mack Hollins?

Who to start in Week 9, who is better for the rest of the season, and who carries more trade value — from the FantasyPros expert consensus and the LeagueLogs Market Index.

Week 9 · 2026 season · Consensus updated November 6 at 11:11 AM EST

Connect your league and an AI analyst settles debates like this one against your actual roster.

The lean

  • This week: Weekly comparison unavailable
  • Rest of season: Mack Hollins — 4 of 6 experts
  • Trade value: close to even

Some comparison data is unavailable. Read each available measure separately and check player status before deciding.

Chimere DikeMack Hollins
Rest of season
2 of 6 experts rank Chimere Dike ahead · 4 rank Mack Hollins ahead
WR282#252–#319WR88#73–#106edge
Week 9—WR100#74–#116
Week 9 projection (PPR)0.08.9edge
Market Index value (redraft PPR)3 #307 overall3 #257 overall
Last 30 days (Market Index)+2 ranks · +2 val-1 ranks · -1 val
Rostered2%4%
Bye911
StatusNo injury designationQUESTIONABLE (Calf) · LIMIT → LIMIT · 0.53355% to play

Expert consensus and ownership data via FantasyPros · Market Index values by LeagueLogs

Comparing a trade rather than a lineup choice? Check both sides of the offer with the AI Trade Analyzer, or review your Sleeper roster’s strengths and weaknesses.

Go deeper

More comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Who should I start in Week 9, Chimere Dike or Mack Hollins?
Weekly consensus is not available for both Chimere Dike and Mack Hollins on the same board. That is not a tie or a recommendation to sit either player. Check their player pages for current status and revisit when both are ranked.
Who is better for the rest of the season, Chimere Dike or Mack Hollins?
Mack Hollins. Rest-of-season consensus: Chimere Dike WR282 (range #252–#319) vs Mack Hollins WR88 (range #73–#106). 4 of 6 FantasyPros experts who rank both have Mack Hollins ahead for the rest of the season.
Should I trade Chimere Dike for Mack Hollins?
On the LeagueLogs Market Index (redraft PPR) Chimere Dike is ranked #307 overall and Mack Hollins #257, so a one-for-one is close to even. Run the exact deal through the free AI Trade Analyzer for a verdict on your league's scoring.