Chig Okonkwo or Tyler Higbee?
Who to start in Week 5, who is better for the rest of the season, and who carries more trade value — from the FantasyPros expert consensus and the LeagueLogs Market Index.
Week 5 · 2026 season · Consensus updated October 12 at 12:11 AM EDT
Connect your league and an AI analyst settles debates like this one against your actual roster.
The lean
- This week: Tyler Higbee
- Rest of season: Chig Okonkwo — 5 of 5 experts
- Trade value: Chig Okonkwo
The weekly, season-long and trade-value calls differ. Choose the measure that fits your decision.
| Chig Okonkwo | Tyler Higbee | |
|---|---|---|
| Rest of season 5 of 5 experts rank Chig Okonkwo ahead · 0 rank Tyler Higbee ahead | TE27#23–#31edge | TE35#30–#43 |
| Week 5 | TE28#24–#33 | TE24#18–#30edge |
| Week 5 projection (PPR) | 6.8 | 7.3 |
| Market Index value (redraft PPR) | 6 #156 overalledge | 4 #240 overall |
| Last 30 days (Market Index) | 0 ranks · 0 val | +176 ranks · +154 val |
| Rostered | 18% | 3% |
| Bye | 7 | 11 |
| Status | No injury designation | No injury designation |
Expert consensus and ownership data via FantasyPros · Market Index values by LeagueLogs
Go deeper
More comparisons
Frequently Asked Questions
- Who should I start in Week 5, Chig Okonkwo or Tyler Higbee?
- Tyler Higbee. This week's consensus has Chig Okonkwo at TE28 (range #24–#33) and Tyler Higbee at TE24 (range #18–#30). Projections: 6.8 vs 7.3 PPR points.
- Who is better for the rest of the season, Chig Okonkwo or Tyler Higbee?
- Chig Okonkwo. Rest-of-season consensus: Chig Okonkwo TE27 (range #23–#31) vs Tyler Higbee TE35 (range #30–#43). 5 of 5 FantasyPros experts who rank both have Chig Okonkwo ahead for the rest of the season.
- Should I trade Chig Okonkwo for Tyler Higbee?
- On the LeagueLogs Market Index (redraft PPR) Chig Okonkwo is ranked #156 overall and Tyler Higbee #240, so Chig Okonkwo carries more trade value and a one-for-one favors the side receiving him. Run the exact deal through the free AI Trade Analyzer for a verdict on your league's scoring.