Darnell Washington or Tyler Higbee?
Who to start in Week 5, who is better for the rest of the season, and who carries more trade value — from the FantasyPros expert consensus and the LeagueLogs Market Index.
Week 5 · 2026 season · Consensus updated October 7 at 12:11 PM EDT
Connect your league and an AI analyst settles debates like this one against your actual roster.
The lean
- This week: Tyler Higbee
- Rest of season: Tyler Higbee — 3 of 4 experts
- Trade value: close to even
At least one measure is close to even. Your scoring, lineup and matchup can help separate them.
| Darnell Washington | Tyler Higbee | |
|---|---|---|
| Rest of season 1 of 4 experts rank Darnell Washington ahead · 3 rank Tyler Higbee ahead | TE36#35–#38 | TE35#30–#43edge |
| Week 5 | TE27#24–#30 | TE18#16–#20edge |
| Week 5 projection (PPR) | 5.8 | 6.7edge |
| Market Index value (redraft PPR) | 3 #265 overall | 4 #240 overall |
| Last 30 days (Market Index) | +82 ranks · +78 val | +155 ranks · +143 val |
| Rostered | 3% | 3% |
| Bye | 9 | 11 |
| Status | No injury designation | No injury designation |
Expert consensus and ownership data via FantasyPros · Market Index values by LeagueLogs
Go deeper
More comparisons
Frequently Asked Questions
- Who should I start in Week 5, Darnell Washington or Tyler Higbee?
- Tyler Higbee. This week's consensus has Darnell Washington at TE27 (range #24–#30) and Tyler Higbee at TE18 (range #16–#20). Projections: 5.8 vs 6.7 PPR points.
- Who is better for the rest of the season, Darnell Washington or Tyler Higbee?
- Tyler Higbee. Rest-of-season consensus: Darnell Washington TE36 (range #35–#38) vs Tyler Higbee TE35 (range #30–#43). 3 of 4 FantasyPros experts who rank both have Tyler Higbee ahead for the rest of the season.
- Should I trade Darnell Washington for Tyler Higbee?
- On the LeagueLogs Market Index (redraft PPR) Darnell Washington is ranked #265 overall and Tyler Higbee #240, so a one-for-one is close to even. Run the exact deal through the free AI Trade Analyzer for a verdict on your league's scoring.