Cedric Tillman or Jalen Tolbert?
Who to start in Week 5, who is better for the rest of the season, and who carries more trade value — from the FantasyPros expert consensus and the LeagueLogs Market Index.
Week 5 · 2026 season · Consensus updated October 12 at 6:11 PM EDT
Connect your league and an AI analyst settles debates like this one against your actual roster.
The lean
- This week: Jalen Tolbert
- Rest of season: Jalen Tolbert — 1 of 1 experts
- Trade value: close to even
At least one measure is close to even. Your scoring, lineup and matchup can help separate them.
| Cedric Tillman | Jalen Tolbert | |
|---|---|---|
| Rest of season 0 of 1 experts rank Cedric Tillman ahead · 1 rank Jalen Tolbert ahead | WR128#114–#137 | WR119#105–#128edge |
| Week 5 | WR135#129–#144 | WR119#101–#145edge |
| Week 5 projection (PPR) | 0.2 | 2.8edge |
| Market Index value (redraft PPR) | 2 #346 overall | 2 #378 overall |
| Last 30 days (Market Index) | +32 ranks · +22 val | -32 ranks · -22 val |
| Rostered | 1% | 1% |
| Bye | 8 | 6 |
| Status | No injury designation | No injury designation |
Expert consensus and ownership data via FantasyPros · Market Index values by LeagueLogs
Go deeper
More comparisons
Frequently Asked Questions
- Who should I start in Week 5, Cedric Tillman or Jalen Tolbert?
- Jalen Tolbert. This week's consensus has Cedric Tillman at WR135 (range #129–#144) and Jalen Tolbert at WR119 (range #101–#145). Projections: 0.2 vs 2.8 PPR points.
- Who is better for the rest of the season, Cedric Tillman or Jalen Tolbert?
- Jalen Tolbert. Rest-of-season consensus: Cedric Tillman WR128 (range #114–#137) vs Jalen Tolbert WR119 (range #105–#128). 1 of 1 FantasyPros experts who rank both have Jalen Tolbert ahead for the rest of the season.
- Should I trade Cedric Tillman for Jalen Tolbert?
- On the LeagueLogs Market Index (redraft PPR) Cedric Tillman is ranked #346 overall and Jalen Tolbert #378, so a one-for-one is close to even. Run the exact deal through the free AI Trade Analyzer for a verdict on your league's scoring.