Tommy Tremble or Zach Ertz?

Who to start in Week 9, who is better for the rest of the season, and who carries more trade value — from the FantasyPros expert consensus and the LeagueLogs Market Index.

Week 9 · 2026 season · Consensus updated November 6 at 11:11 AM EST

Connect your league and an AI analyst settles debates like this one against your actual roster.

The lean

  • This week: Tommy Tremble
  • Rest of season: Tommy Tremble — 2 of 2 experts
  • Trade value: close to even

At least one measure is close to even. Your scoring, lineup and matchup can help separate them.

Tommy TrembleZach Ertz
Rest of season
2 of 2 experts rank Tommy Tremble ahead · 0 rank Zach Ertz ahead
TE43#40–#50edgeTE56#51–#61
Week 9TE33#28–#39edgeTE53#52–#54
Week 9 projection (PPR)4.5edge0.0
Market Index value (redraft PPR)3 #322 overall2 #372 overall
Last 30 days (Market Index)+54 ranks · +40 val-47 ranks · -34 val
Rostered1%1%
Bye510
StatusNo injury designationNo injury designation

Expert consensus and ownership data via FantasyPros · Market Index values by LeagueLogs

Comparing a trade rather than a lineup choice? Check both sides of the offer with the AI Trade Analyzer, or review your Sleeper roster’s strengths and weaknesses.

Go deeper

More comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Who should I start in Week 9, Tommy Tremble or Zach Ertz?
Tommy Tremble. This week's consensus has Tommy Tremble at TE33 (range #28–#39) and Zach Ertz at TE53 (range #52–#54). Projections: 4.5 vs 0.0 PPR points.
Who is better for the rest of the season, Tommy Tremble or Zach Ertz?
Tommy Tremble. Rest-of-season consensus: Tommy Tremble TE43 (range #40–#50) vs Zach Ertz TE56 (range #51–#61). 2 of 2 FantasyPros experts who rank both have Tommy Tremble ahead for the rest of the season.
Should I trade Tommy Tremble for Zach Ertz?
On the LeagueLogs Market Index (redraft PPR) Tommy Tremble is ranked #322 overall and Zach Ertz #372, so a one-for-one is close to even. Run the exact deal through the free AI Trade Analyzer for a verdict on your league's scoring.