Tanner McKee or Tyson Bagent?
Who to start in Week 9, who is better for the rest of the season, and who carries more trade value — from the FantasyPros expert consensus and the LeagueLogs Market Index.
Week 9 · 2026 season · Consensus updated November 6 at 11:11 AM EST
Connect your league and an AI analyst settles debates like this one against your actual roster.
The lean
- This week: Tyson Bagent
- Rest of season: Tanner McKee — 2 of 2 experts
- Trade value: close to even
The weekly, season-long and trade-value calls differ. Choose the measure that fits your decision.
| Tanner McKee | Tyson Bagent | |
|---|---|---|
| Rest of season 2 of 2 experts rank Tanner McKee ahead · 0 rank Tyson Bagent ahead | QB37#31–#47edge | QB42#38–#44 |
| Week 9 | QB46#32–#81 | QB41#36–#50edge |
| Week 9 projection (PPR) | 3.4edge | 0.3 |
| Market Index value (redraft PPR) | 3 #319 overall | 2 #397 overall |
| Last 30 days (Market Index) | +226 ranks · +166 val | -50 ranks · -32 val |
| Rostered | 3% | 1% |
| Bye | 10 | 10 |
| Status | NOT STARTING (Chest) · FULL → LIMIT · 0.76112% to play | No injury designation |
Expert consensus and ownership data via FantasyPros · Market Index values by LeagueLogs
Comparing a trade rather than a lineup choice? Check both sides of the offer with the AI Trade Analyzer, or review your Sleeper roster’s strengths and weaknesses.
Go deeper
More comparisons
Frequently Asked Questions
- Who should I start in Week 9, Tanner McKee or Tyson Bagent?
- Tyson Bagent. This week's consensus has Tanner McKee at QB46 (range #32–#81) and Tyson Bagent at QB41 (range #36–#50). Projections: 3.4 vs 0.3 PPR points.
- Who is better for the rest of the season, Tanner McKee or Tyson Bagent?
- Tanner McKee. Rest-of-season consensus: Tanner McKee QB37 (range #31–#47) vs Tyson Bagent QB42 (range #38–#44). 2 of 2 FantasyPros experts who rank both have Tanner McKee ahead for the rest of the season.
- Should I trade Tanner McKee for Tyson Bagent?
- On the LeagueLogs Market Index (redraft PPR) Tanner McKee is ranked #319 overall and Tyson Bagent #397, so a one-for-one is close to even. Run the exact deal through the free AI Trade Analyzer for a verdict on your league's scoring.