Tanner McKee or Tyler Huntley?

Who to start in Week 9, who is better for the rest of the season, and who carries more trade value — from the FantasyPros expert consensus and the LeagueLogs Market Index.

Week 9 · 2026 season · Consensus updated November 6 at 11:11 AM EST

Connect your league and an AI analyst settles debates like this one against your actual roster.

The lean

  • This week: Weekly comparison unavailable
  • Rest of season: Tanner McKee
  • Trade value: close to even

Some comparison data is unavailable. Read each available measure separately and check player status before deciding.

Tanner McKeeTyler Huntley
Rest of seasonQB37#31–#47edgeQB323#323–#323
Week 9QB46#32–#81—
Week 9 projection (PPR)3.4edge0.0
Market Index value (redraft PPR)3 #319 overall2 #370 overall
Last 30 days (Market Index)+226 ranks · +166 val-5 ranks · -3 val
Rostered3%2%
Bye1013
StatusNOT STARTING (Chest) · FULL → LIMIT · 0.76112% to playIR (Toe) · DNP → DNP → DNP · 0% to play

Expert consensus and ownership data via FantasyPros · Market Index values by LeagueLogs

Comparing a trade rather than a lineup choice? Check both sides of the offer with the AI Trade Analyzer, or review your Sleeper roster’s strengths and weaknesses.

Go deeper

More comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Who should I start in Week 9, Tanner McKee or Tyler Huntley?
Weekly consensus is not available for both Tanner McKee and Tyler Huntley on the same board. That is not a tie or a recommendation to sit either player. Check their player pages for current status and revisit when both are ranked.
Who is better for the rest of the season, Tanner McKee or Tyler Huntley?
Tanner McKee. Rest-of-season consensus: Tanner McKee QB37 (range #31–#47) vs Tyler Huntley QB323 (range #323–#323).
Should I trade Tanner McKee for Tyler Huntley?
On the LeagueLogs Market Index (redraft PPR) Tanner McKee is ranked #319 overall and Tyler Huntley #370, so a one-for-one is close to even. Run the exact deal through the free AI Trade Analyzer for a verdict on your league's scoring.