Ollie Gordon II or RJ Harvey?
Who to start in Week 5, who is better for the rest of the season, and who carries more trade value — from the FantasyPros expert consensus and the LeagueLogs Market Index.
Week 5 · 2026 season · Consensus updated October 12 at 12:11 AM EDT
Connect your league and an AI analyst settles debates like this one against your actual roster.
The lean
- This week: even on the consensus
- Rest of season: even on the consensus — 4 of 7 experts
- Trade value: close to even
At least one measure is close to even. Your scoring, lineup and matchup can help separate them.
| Ollie Gordon II | RJ Harvey | |
|---|---|---|
| Rest of season 4 of 7 experts rank Ollie Gordon II ahead · 3 rank RJ Harvey ahead | RB31#28–#35 | RB31#25–#34 |
| Week 5 | RB25#20–#29 | RB25#14–#33 |
| Week 5 projection (PPR) | 10.4 | 10.8 |
| Market Index value (redraft PPR) | 6 #137 overall | 7 #115 overall |
| Last 30 days (Market Index) | +130 ranks · +306 val | -24 ranks · -188 val |
| Rostered | 79% | 83% |
| Bye | 6 | 10 |
| Status | No injury designation | No injury designation |
Expert consensus and ownership data via FantasyPros · Market Index values by LeagueLogs
Go deeper
More comparisons
Frequently Asked Questions
- Who should I start in Week 5, Ollie Gordon II or RJ Harvey?
- It is a coin flip on the consensus: Ollie Gordon II is RB25 (range #20–#29) and RJ Harvey is RB25 (range #14–#33) this week. Matchup and your other options decide it.
- Who is better for the rest of the season, Ollie Gordon II or RJ Harvey?
- The experts have them effectively even for the rest of the season: Ollie Gordon II RB31 (range #28–#35) vs RJ Harvey RB31 (range #25–#34). 4 of 7 FantasyPros experts who rank both have Ollie Gordon II ahead for the rest of the season.
- Should I trade Ollie Gordon II for RJ Harvey?
- On the LeagueLogs Market Index (redraft PPR) Ollie Gordon II is ranked #137 overall and RJ Harvey #115, so a one-for-one is close to even. Run the exact deal through the free AI Trade Analyzer for a verdict on your league's scoring.