Najee Harris or Tyrone Tracy Jr.?
Who to start in Week 3, who is better for the rest of the season, and who carries more trade value — from the FantasyPros expert consensus and the LeagueLogs Market Index.
Week 3 · 2026 season · Consensus updated September 22 at 6:11 AM EDT
Connect your league and an AI analyst settles debates like this one against your actual roster.
The lean
- This week: even on the consensus
- Rest of season: Najee Harris — 2 of 4 experts
- Trade value: close to even
At least one measure is close to even. Your scoring, lineup and matchup can help separate them.
| Najee Harris | Tyrone Tracy Jr. | |
|---|---|---|
| Rest of season 2 of 4 experts rank Najee Harris ahead · 2 rank Tyrone Tracy Jr. ahead | RB62#59–#68edge | RB64#57–#71 |
| Week 3 | RB62#60–#69 | RB62#62–#63 |
| Week 3 projection (PPR) | 1.9edge | 1.1 |
| Market Index value (redraft PPR) | 4 #228 overall | 5 #173 overall |
| Last 30 days (Market Index) | +52 ranks · +71 val | -33 ranks · -116 val |
| Rostered | 7% | 12% |
| Bye | 8 | 8 |
| Status | No injury designation | No injury designation |
Expert consensus and ownership data via FantasyPros · Market Index values by LeagueLogs
Go deeper
More comparisons
Frequently Asked Questions
- Who should I start in Week 3, Najee Harris or Tyrone Tracy Jr.?
- It is a coin flip on the consensus: Najee Harris is RB62 (range #60–#69) and Tyrone Tracy Jr. is RB62 (range #62–#63) this week. Matchup and your other options decide it.
- Who is better for the rest of the season, Najee Harris or Tyrone Tracy Jr.?
- Najee Harris. Rest-of-season consensus: Najee Harris RB62 (range #59–#68) vs Tyrone Tracy Jr. RB64 (range #57–#71). 2 of 4 FantasyPros experts who rank both have Najee Harris ahead for the rest of the season.
- Should I trade Najee Harris for Tyrone Tracy Jr.?
- On the LeagueLogs Market Index (redraft PPR) Najee Harris is ranked #228 overall and Tyrone Tracy Jr. #173, so a one-for-one is close to even. Run the exact deal through the free AI Trade Analyzer for a verdict on your league's scoring.