Mitchell Evans or Nate Boerkircher?
Who to start in Week 9, who is better for the rest of the season, and who carries more trade value — from the FantasyPros expert consensus and the LeagueLogs Market Index.
Week 9 · 2026 season · Consensus updated November 6 at 11:11 AM EST
Connect your league and an AI analyst settles debates like this one against your actual roster.
The lean
- This week: Nate Boerkircher
- Rest of season: Mitchell Evans — 2 of 2 experts
- Trade value: close to even
The weekly, season-long and trade-value calls differ. Choose the measure that fits your decision.
| Mitchell Evans | Nate Boerkircher | |
|---|---|---|
| Rest of season 2 of 2 experts rank Mitchell Evans ahead · 0 rank Nate Boerkircher ahead | TE52#51–#52edge | TE55#52–#57 |
| Week 9 | TE51#47–#56 | TE45#42–#64edge |
| Week 9 projection (PPR) | 2.4 | 2.9 |
| Market Index value (redraft PPR) | 2 #384 overall | 2 #398 overall |
| Last 30 days (Market Index) | -53 ranks · -36 val | -11 ranks · -6 val |
| Rostered | 1% | 1% |
| Bye | 5 | 7 |
| Status | No injury designation | No injury designation |
Expert consensus and ownership data via FantasyPros · Market Index values by LeagueLogs
Comparing a trade rather than a lineup choice? Check both sides of the offer with the AI Trade Analyzer, or review your Sleeper roster’s strengths and weaknesses.
Go deeper
More comparisons
Frequently Asked Questions
- Who should I start in Week 9, Mitchell Evans or Nate Boerkircher?
- Nate Boerkircher. This week's consensus has Mitchell Evans at TE51 (range #47–#56) and Nate Boerkircher at TE45 (range #42–#64). Projections: 2.4 vs 2.9 PPR points.
- Who is better for the rest of the season, Mitchell Evans or Nate Boerkircher?
- Mitchell Evans. Rest-of-season consensus: Mitchell Evans TE52 (range #51–#52) vs Nate Boerkircher TE55 (range #52–#57). 2 of 2 FantasyPros experts who rank both have Mitchell Evans ahead for the rest of the season.
- Should I trade Mitchell Evans for Nate Boerkircher?
- On the LeagueLogs Market Index (redraft PPR) Mitchell Evans is ranked #384 overall and Nate Boerkircher #398, so a one-for-one is close to even. Run the exact deal through the free AI Trade Analyzer for a verdict on your league's scoring.