Malik Willis or Sam Darnold?

Who to start in Week 7, who is better for the rest of the season, and who carries more trade value — from the FantasyPros expert consensus and the LeagueLogs Market Index.

Week 7 · 2026 season · Consensus updated October 22 at 12:11 PM EDT

Connect your league and an AI analyst settles debates like this one against your actual roster.

The lean

  • This week: Sam Darnold
  • Rest of season: Sam Darnold — 5 of 8 experts
  • Trade value: close to even

At least one measure is close to even. Your scoring, lineup and matchup can help separate them.

Malik WillisSam Darnold
Rest of season
3 of 8 experts rank Malik Willis ahead · 5 rank Sam Darnold ahead
QB23#20–#25QB22#20–#23edge
Week 7QB25#21–#28QB23#21–#26edge
Week 7 projection (PPR)14.914.5
Market Index value (redraft PPR)6 #136 overall7 #130 overall
Last 30 days (Market Index)-6 ranks · -28 val+8 ranks · +37 val
Rostered21%40%
Bye611
StatusNo injury designationNo injury designation

Expert consensus and ownership data via FantasyPros · Market Index values by LeagueLogs

Comparing a trade rather than a lineup choice? Check both sides of the offer with the AI Trade Analyzer, or review your Sleeper roster’s strengths and weaknesses.

Go deeper

More comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Who should I start in Week 7, Malik Willis or Sam Darnold?
Sam Darnold. This week's consensus has Malik Willis at QB25 (range #21–#28) and Sam Darnold at QB23 (range #21–#26). Projections: 14.9 vs 14.5 PPR points.
Who is better for the rest of the season, Malik Willis or Sam Darnold?
Sam Darnold. Rest-of-season consensus: Malik Willis QB23 (range #20–#25) vs Sam Darnold QB22 (range #20–#23). 5 of 8 FantasyPros experts who rank both have Sam Darnold ahead for the rest of the season.
Should I trade Malik Willis for Sam Darnold?
On the LeagueLogs Market Index (redraft PPR) Malik Willis is ranked #136 overall and Sam Darnold #130, so a one-for-one is close to even. Run the exact deal through the free AI Trade Analyzer for a verdict on your league's scoring.