Ladd McConkey or Mike Evans?
Who to start in Week 3, who is better for the rest of the season, and who carries more trade value — from the FantasyPros expert consensus and the LeagueLogs Market Index.
Week 3 · 2026 season · Consensus updated September 22 at 6:11 AM EDT
Connect your league and an AI analyst settles debates like this one against your actual roster.
The lean
- This week: Mike Evans
- Rest of season: Ladd McConkey — 3 of 4 experts
- Trade value: Ladd McConkey
The weekly, season-long and trade-value calls differ. Choose the measure that fits your decision.
| Ladd McConkey | Mike Evans | |
|---|---|---|
| Rest of season 3 of 4 experts rank Ladd McConkey ahead · 1 rank Mike Evans ahead | WR21#19–#24edge | WR24#19–#27 |
| Week 3 | WR18#15–#21 | WR14#13–#18edge |
| Week 3 projection (PPR) | 13.2edge | 12.4 |
| Market Index value (redraft PPR) | 22 #35 overalledge | 14 #61 overall |
| Last 30 days (Market Index) | -1 ranks · -53 val | -7 ranks · -157 val |
| Rostered | 98% | 95% |
| Bye | 7 | 8 |
| Status | No injury designation | No injury designation |
Expert consensus and ownership data via FantasyPros · Market Index values by LeagueLogs
Go deeper
More comparisons
Frequently Asked Questions
- Who should I start in Week 3, Ladd McConkey or Mike Evans?
- Mike Evans. This week's consensus has Ladd McConkey at WR18 (range #15–#21) and Mike Evans at WR14 (range #13–#18). Projections: 13.2 vs 12.4 PPR points.
- Who is better for the rest of the season, Ladd McConkey or Mike Evans?
- Ladd McConkey. Rest-of-season consensus: Ladd McConkey WR21 (range #19–#24) vs Mike Evans WR24 (range #19–#27). 3 of 4 FantasyPros experts who rank both have Ladd McConkey ahead for the rest of the season.
- Should I trade Ladd McConkey for Mike Evans?
- On the LeagueLogs Market Index (redraft PPR) Ladd McConkey is ranked #35 overall and Mike Evans #61, so Ladd McConkey carries more trade value and a one-for-one favors the side receiving him. Run the exact deal through the free AI Trade Analyzer for a verdict on your league's scoring.