Kyler Murray or Tyler Shough?
Who to start in Week 5, who is better for the rest of the season, and who carries more trade value — from the FantasyPros expert consensus and the LeagueLogs Market Index.
Week 5 · 2026 season · Consensus updated October 12 at 6:11 PM EDT
Connect your league and an AI analyst settles debates like this one against your actual roster.
The lean
- This week: Tyler Shough
- Rest of season: Tyler Shough — 8 of 8 experts
- Trade value: Tyler Shough
All three measures favor the same player. Your scoring, lineup and matchup still matter.
| Kyler Murray | Tyler Shough | |
|---|---|---|
| Rest of season 0 of 8 experts rank Kyler Murray ahead · 8 rank Tyler Shough ahead | QB22#20–#24 | QB15#12–#17edge |
| Week 5 | QB16#12–#24 | QB15#10–#23edge |
| Week 5 projection (PPR) | 14.5 | 16.5edge |
| Market Index value (redraft PPR) | 6 #134 overall | 9 #94 overalledge |
| Last 30 days (Market Index) | -22 ranks · -123 val | +30 ranks · +212 val |
| Rostered | 60% | 86% |
| Bye | 6 | 8 |
| Status | No injury designation | No injury designation |
Expert consensus and ownership data via FantasyPros · Market Index values by LeagueLogs
Go deeper
More comparisons
Frequently Asked Questions
- Who should I start in Week 5, Kyler Murray or Tyler Shough?
- Tyler Shough. This week's consensus has Kyler Murray at QB16 (range #12–#24) and Tyler Shough at QB15 (range #10–#23). Projections: 14.5 vs 16.5 PPR points.
- Who is better for the rest of the season, Kyler Murray or Tyler Shough?
- Tyler Shough. Rest-of-season consensus: Kyler Murray QB22 (range #20–#24) vs Tyler Shough QB15 (range #12–#17). 8 of 8 FantasyPros experts who rank both have Tyler Shough ahead for the rest of the season.
- Should I trade Kyler Murray for Tyler Shough?
- On the LeagueLogs Market Index (redraft PPR) Kyler Murray is ranked #134 overall and Tyler Shough #94, so Tyler Shough carries more trade value and a one-for-one favors the side receiving him. Run the exact deal through the free AI Trade Analyzer for a verdict on your league's scoring.