Konata Mumpfield or Tutu Atwell?
Who to start in Week 6, who is better for the rest of the season, and who carries more trade value — from the FantasyPros expert consensus and the LeagueLogs Market Index.
Week 6 · 2026 season · Consensus updated October 15 at 6:11 PM EDT
Connect your league and an AI analyst settles debates like this one against your actual roster.
The lean
- This week: Tutu Atwell
- Rest of season: Konata Mumpfield — 1 of 1 experts
- Trade value: close to even
The weekly, season-long and trade-value calls differ. Choose the measure that fits your decision.
| Konata Mumpfield | Tutu Atwell | |
|---|---|---|
| Rest of season 1 of 1 experts rank Konata Mumpfield ahead · 0 rank Tutu Atwell ahead | WR95#92–#98edge | WR118#118–#118 |
| Week 6 | WR105#92–#118 | WR102#93–#116edge |
| Week 6 projection (PPR) | 1.6 | 3.1edge |
| Market Index value (redraft PPR) | 3 #273 overall | 2 #378 overall |
| Last 30 days (Market Index) | +135 ranks · +106 val | +78 ranks · +39 val |
| Rostered | 2% | 1% |
| Bye | 11 | 11 |
| Status | No injury designation | No injury designation |
Expert consensus and ownership data via FantasyPros · Market Index values by LeagueLogs
Go deeper
More comparisons
Frequently Asked Questions
- Who should I start in Week 6, Konata Mumpfield or Tutu Atwell?
- Tutu Atwell. This week's consensus has Konata Mumpfield at WR105 (range #92–#118) and Tutu Atwell at WR102 (range #93–#116). Projections: 1.6 vs 3.1 PPR points.
- Who is better for the rest of the season, Konata Mumpfield or Tutu Atwell?
- Konata Mumpfield. Rest-of-season consensus: Konata Mumpfield WR95 (range #92–#98) vs Tutu Atwell WR118 (range #118–#118). 1 of 1 FantasyPros experts who rank both have Konata Mumpfield ahead for the rest of the season.
- Should I trade Konata Mumpfield for Tutu Atwell?
- On the LeagueLogs Market Index (redraft PPR) Konata Mumpfield is ranked #273 overall and Tutu Atwell #378, so a one-for-one is close to even. Run the exact deal through the free AI Trade Analyzer for a verdict on your league's scoring.