Khalil Shakir or MarShawn Lloyd?

Who to start in Week 6, who is better for the rest of the season, and who carries more trade value — from the FantasyPros expert consensus and the LeagueLogs Market Index.

Week 6 · 2026 season · Consensus updated October 14 at 12:11 PM EDT

Connect your league and an AI analyst settles debates like this one against your actual roster.

The lean

  • This week: MarShawn Lloyd
  • Rest of season: Khalil Shakir — 4 of 4 experts
  • Trade value: Khalil Shakir

The weekly, season-long and trade-value calls differ. Choose the measure that fits your decision.

Khalil ShakirMarShawn Lloyd
Rest of season (overall)
4 of 4 experts rank Khalil Shakir ahead · 0 rank MarShawn Lloyd ahead
#85#77–#90edge#177#149–#223
Week 6 (flex)FLX74#66–#91FLX59#51–#81edge
Week 6 projection (PPR)9.611.4edge
Market Index value (redraft PPR)11 #80 overalledge5 #175 overall
Last 30 days (Market Index)+48 ranks · +383 val-71 ranks · -328 val
Rostered60%63%
Bye711
StatusNo injury designationNo injury designation

Expert consensus and ownership data via FantasyPros · Market Index values by LeagueLogs

Go deeper

More comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Who should I start in Week 6, Khalil Shakir or MarShawn Lloyd?
MarShawn Lloyd. This week's consensus has Khalil Shakir at WR36 (range #33–#44) and MarShawn Lloyd at RB22 (range #20–#26); on the flex board it is #74 vs #59. Projections: 9.6 vs 11.4 PPR points.
Who is better for the rest of the season, Khalil Shakir or MarShawn Lloyd?
Khalil Shakir. Rest-of-season consensus: Khalil Shakir WR45 (range #40–#47) vs MarShawn Lloyd RB45 (range #38–#53). 4 of 4 FantasyPros experts who rank both have Khalil Shakir ahead for the rest of the season.
Should I trade Khalil Shakir for MarShawn Lloyd?
On the LeagueLogs Market Index (redraft PPR) Khalil Shakir is ranked #80 overall and MarShawn Lloyd #175, so Khalil Shakir carries more trade value and a one-for-one favors the side receiving him. Run the exact deal through the free AI Trade Analyzer for a verdict on your league's scoring.