Kaytron Allen or Tyrone Tracy Jr.?
Who to start in Week 5, who is better for the rest of the season, and who carries more trade value — from the FantasyPros expert consensus and the LeagueLogs Market Index.
Week 5 · 2026 season · Consensus updated October 10 at 12:11 PM EDT
Connect your league and an AI analyst settles debates like this one against your actual roster.
The lean
- This week: Tyrone Tracy Jr.
- Rest of season: Kaytron Allen — 4 of 7 experts
- Trade value: close to even
The weekly, season-long and trade-value calls differ. Choose the measure that fits your decision.
| Kaytron Allen | Tyrone Tracy Jr. | |
|---|---|---|
| Rest of season 4 of 7 experts rank Kaytron Allen ahead · 3 rank Tyrone Tracy Jr. ahead | RB71#65–#75edge | RB73#64–#83 |
| Week 5 | RB70#62–#80 | RB67#61–#75edge |
| Week 5 projection (PPR) | 0.8 | 1.4 |
| Market Index value (redraft PPR) | 3 #305 overall | 3 #312 overall |
| Last 30 days (Market Index) | -63 ranks · -74 val | -138 ranks · -221 val |
| Rostered | 4% | 6% |
| Bye | 6 | 8 |
| Status | No injury designation | No injury designation |
Expert consensus and ownership data via FantasyPros · Market Index values by LeagueLogs
Go deeper
More comparisons
Frequently Asked Questions
- Who should I start in Week 5, Kaytron Allen or Tyrone Tracy Jr.?
- Tyrone Tracy Jr.. This week's consensus has Kaytron Allen at RB70 (range #62–#80) and Tyrone Tracy Jr. at RB67 (range #61–#75). Projections: 0.8 vs 1.4 PPR points.
- Who is better for the rest of the season, Kaytron Allen or Tyrone Tracy Jr.?
- Kaytron Allen. Rest-of-season consensus: Kaytron Allen RB71 (range #65–#75) vs Tyrone Tracy Jr. RB73 (range #64–#83). 4 of 7 FantasyPros experts who rank both have Kaytron Allen ahead for the rest of the season.
- Should I trade Kaytron Allen for Tyrone Tracy Jr.?
- On the LeagueLogs Market Index (redraft PPR) Kaytron Allen is ranked #305 overall and Tyrone Tracy Jr. #312, so a one-for-one is close to even. Run the exact deal through the free AI Trade Analyzer for a verdict on your league's scoring.