Who should I start in Week 9, Justin Fields or Mac Jones?

Weekly consensus is not available for both Justin Fields and Mac Jones on the same board. That is not a tie or a recommendation to sit either player. Check their player pages for current status and revisit when both are ranked.

Who is better for the rest of the season, Justin Fields or Mac Jones?

Mac Jones. Rest-of-season consensus: Justin Fields QB370 (range #370–#370) vs Mac Jones QB45 (range #39–#51).

Should I trade Justin Fields for Mac Jones?

On the LeagueLogs Market Index (redraft PPR) Justin Fields is ranked #415 overall and Mac Jones #390, so a one-for-one is close to even. Run the exact deal through the free AI Trade Analyzer for a verdict on your league's scoring.

Justin Fields or Mac Jones?

Who to start in Week 9, who is better for the rest of the season, and who carries more trade value — from the FantasyPros expert consensus and the LeagueLogs Market Index.

Week 9 · 2026 season · Consensus updated November 6 at 11:11 AM EST

Connect your league and an AI analyst settles debates like this one against your actual roster.

App Store Google Play

The lean

This week: Weekly comparison unavailable
Rest of season: Mac Jones
Trade value: close to even

Some comparison data is unavailable. Read each available measure separately and check player status before deciding.

	Justin Fields	Mac Jones
Rest of season	QB370#370–#370	QB45#39–#51edge
Week 9	—	QB41#33–#54
Week 9 projection (PPR)	0.5	0.5
Market Index value (redraft PPR)	2 #415 overall	2 #390 overall
Last 30 days (Market Index)	+132 ranks · +105 val	+10 ranks · +6 val
Rostered	1%	1%
Bye	5	8
Status	No injury designation	No injury designation

Expert consensus and ownership data via FantasyPros · Market Index values by LeagueLogs

Comparing a trade rather than a lineup choice? Check both sides of the offer with the AI Trade Analyzer, or review your Sleeper roster’s strengths and weaknesses.

Go deeper

More comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Who should I start in Week 9, Justin Fields or Mac Jones?: Weekly consensus is not available for both Justin Fields and Mac Jones on the same board. That is not a tie or a recommendation to sit either player. Check their player pages for current status and revisit when both are ranked.
Who is better for the rest of the season, Justin Fields or Mac Jones?: Mac Jones. Rest-of-season consensus: Justin Fields QB370 (range #370–#370) vs Mac Jones QB45 (range #39–#51).
Should I trade Justin Fields for Mac Jones?: On the LeagueLogs Market Index (redraft PPR) Justin Fields is ranked #415 overall and Mac Jones #390, so a one-for-one is close to even. Run the exact deal through the free AI Trade Analyzer for a verdict on your league's scoring.