Justin Fields or Mac Jones?

Who to start in Week 1, who is better for the rest of the season, and who carries more trade value — from the FantasyPros expert consensus and the LeagueLogs Market Index.

Week 1 · 2026 season · Consensus updated September 3 at 1:20 PM EDT

Connect your league and an AI analyst settles debates like this one against your actual roster.

The lean

  • This week: Justin Fields
  • Rest of season: Mac Jones23 of 35 experts
  • Trade value: close to even

The horizons disagree, which is exactly when your roster context decides it.

Justin FieldsMac Jones
Rest of season
12 of 35 experts rank Justin Fields ahead · 23 rank Mac Jones ahead
QB40#34–#49QB39#35–#52edge
Week 1QB39#36–#44edgeQB41#34–#47
Week 1 projection (PPR)0.90.8
Market Index value (redraft PPR)2 #432 overall2 #424 overall
Rostered2%2%
Bye58
StatusNo injury designationNo injury designation

Expert consensus and ownership data via FantasyPros · Market Index values by LeagueLogs

Go deeper

More comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Who should I start in Week 1, Justin Fields or Mac Jones?
Justin Fields. This week's consensus has Justin Fields at QB39 (range #36–#44) and Mac Jones at QB41 (range #34–#47). Projections: 0.9 vs 0.8 PPR points.
Who is better for the rest of the season, Justin Fields or Mac Jones?
Mac Jones. Rest-of-season consensus: Justin Fields QB40 (range #34–#49) vs Mac Jones QB39 (range #35–#52). 23 of 35 FantasyPros experts who rank both have Mac Jones ahead for the rest of the season.
Should I trade Justin Fields for Mac Jones?
On the LeagueLogs Market Index (redraft PPR) Justin Fields is ranked #432 overall and Mac Jones #424, so a one-for-one is close to even. Run the exact deal through the free AI Trade Analyzer for a verdict on your league's scoring.