Josh Whyle or Will Kacmarek?

Who to start in Week 7, who is better for the rest of the season, and who carries more trade value — from the FantasyPros expert consensus and the LeagueLogs Market Index.

Week 7 · 2026 season · Consensus updated October 24 at 6:11 AM EDT

Connect your league and an AI analyst settles debates like this one against your actual roster.

The lean

  • This week: Will Kacmarek
  • Rest of season: Josh Whyle — 1 of 1 experts
  • Trade value: close to even

The weekly, season-long and trade-value calls differ. Choose the measure that fits your decision.

Josh WhyleWill Kacmarek
Rest of season
1 of 1 experts rank Josh Whyle ahead · 0 rank Will Kacmarek ahead
TE64#60–#68edgeTE65#61–#69
Week 7TE68#60–#79TE52#49–#62edge
Week 7 projection (PPR)0.52.1edge
Market Index value (redraft PPR)1 #520 overall2 #434 overall
Last 30 days (Market Index)+83 ranks · +14 val+26 ranks · +5 val
Rostered1%1%
Bye116
StatusNo injury designationNo injury designation

Expert consensus and ownership data via FantasyPros · Market Index values by LeagueLogs

Comparing a trade rather than a lineup choice? Check both sides of the offer with the AI Trade Analyzer, or review your Sleeper roster’s strengths and weaknesses.

Go deeper

More comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Who should I start in Week 7, Josh Whyle or Will Kacmarek?
Will Kacmarek. This week's consensus has Josh Whyle at TE68 (range #60–#79) and Will Kacmarek at TE52 (range #49–#62). Projections: 0.5 vs 2.1 PPR points.
Who is better for the rest of the season, Josh Whyle or Will Kacmarek?
Josh Whyle. Rest-of-season consensus: Josh Whyle TE64 (range #60–#68) vs Will Kacmarek TE65 (range #61–#69). 1 of 1 FantasyPros experts who rank both have Josh Whyle ahead for the rest of the season.
Should I trade Josh Whyle for Will Kacmarek?
On the LeagueLogs Market Index (redraft PPR) Josh Whyle is ranked #520 overall and Will Kacmarek #434, so a one-for-one is close to even. Run the exact deal through the free AI Trade Analyzer for a verdict on your league's scoring.