James Conner or Nicholas Singleton?

Who to start in Week 3, who is better for the rest of the season, and who carries more trade value — from the FantasyPros expert consensus and the LeagueLogs Market Index.

Week 3 · 2026 season · Consensus updated September 22 at 6:11 AM EDT

Connect your league and an AI analyst settles debates like this one against your actual roster.

The lean

  • This week: Weekly comparison unavailable
  • Rest of season: Nicholas Singleton2 of 3 experts
  • Trade value: close to even

Some comparison data is unavailable. Read each available measure separately and check player status before deciding.

James ConnerNicholas Singleton
Rest of season
1 of 3 experts rank James Conner ahead · 2 rank Nicholas Singleton ahead
RB287#260–#313RB72#62–#81edge
Week 3RB82#71–#92
Week 3 projection (PPR)1.8
Market Index value (redraft PPR)4 #244 overall4 #219 overall
Last 30 days (Market Index)-43 ranks · -76 val-11 ranks · -21 val
Rostered9%8%
Bye149
StatusOUTNo injury designation

Expert consensus and ownership data via FantasyPros · Market Index values by LeagueLogs

Go deeper

More comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Who should I start in Week 3, James Conner or Nicholas Singleton?
Weekly consensus is not available for both James Conner and Nicholas Singleton on the same board. That is not a tie or a recommendation to sit either player. Check their player pages for current status and revisit when both are ranked.
Who is better for the rest of the season, James Conner or Nicholas Singleton?
Nicholas Singleton. Rest-of-season consensus: James Conner RB287 (range #260–#313) vs Nicholas Singleton RB72 (range #62–#81). 2 of 3 FantasyPros experts who rank both have Nicholas Singleton ahead for the rest of the season.
Should I trade James Conner for Nicholas Singleton?
On the LeagueLogs Market Index (redraft PPR) James Conner is ranked #244 overall and Nicholas Singleton #219, so a one-for-one is close to even. Run the exact deal through the free AI Trade Analyzer for a verdict on your league's scoring.