James Conner or Josh Jacobs?

Who to start in Week 3, who is better for the rest of the season, and who carries more trade value — from the FantasyPros expert consensus and the LeagueLogs Market Index.

Week 3 · 2026 season · Consensus updated September 22 at 6:11 AM EDT

Connect your league and an AI analyst settles debates like this one against your actual roster.

The lean

  • This week: Weekly comparison unavailable
  • Rest of season: Josh Jacobs3 of 3 experts
  • Trade value: Josh Jacobs

Some comparison data is unavailable. Read each available measure separately and check player status before deciding.

James ConnerJosh Jacobs
Rest of season
0 of 3 experts rank James Conner ahead · 3 rank Josh Jacobs ahead
RB287#260–#313RB152#136–#164edge
Week 3
Week 3 projection (PPR)0.0
Market Index value (redraft PPR)4 #244 overall6 #140 overalledge
Last 30 days (Market Index)-43 ranks · -76 val-96 ranks · -1194 val
Rostered9%88%
Bye1411
StatusOUTNo injury designation

Expert consensus and ownership data via FantasyPros · Market Index values by LeagueLogs

Go deeper

More comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Who should I start in Week 3, James Conner or Josh Jacobs?
Weekly consensus is not available for both James Conner and Josh Jacobs on the same board. That is not a tie or a recommendation to sit either player. Check their player pages for current status and revisit when both are ranked.
Who is better for the rest of the season, James Conner or Josh Jacobs?
Josh Jacobs. Rest-of-season consensus: James Conner RB287 (range #260–#313) vs Josh Jacobs RB152 (range #136–#164). 3 of 3 FantasyPros experts who rank both have Josh Jacobs ahead for the rest of the season.
Should I trade James Conner for Josh Jacobs?
On the LeagueLogs Market Index (redraft PPR) James Conner is ranked #244 overall and Josh Jacobs #140, so Josh Jacobs carries more trade value and a one-for-one favors the side receiving him. Run the exact deal through the free AI Trade Analyzer for a verdict on your league's scoring.