Jalen Nailor or Tyler Allgeier?

Who to start in Week 3, who is better for the rest of the season, and who carries more trade value — from the FantasyPros expert consensus and the LeagueLogs Market Index.

Week 3 · 2026 season · Consensus updated September 22 at 6:11 AM EDT

Connect your league and an AI analyst settles debates like this one against your actual roster.

The lean

  • This week: Jalen Nailor
  • Rest of season: Tyler Allgeier4 of 4 experts
  • Trade value: Tyler Allgeier

The weekly, season-long and trade-value calls differ. Choose the measure that fits your decision.

Jalen NailorTyler Allgeier
Rest of season (overall)
0 of 4 experts rank Jalen Nailor ahead · 4 rank Tyler Allgeier ahead
#214#197–#246#164#130–#199edge
Week 3 (flex)FLX121#115–#127edgeFLX137#119–#149
Week 3 projection (PPR)7.37.3
Market Index value (redraft PPR)5 #176 overall6 #133 overalledge
Last 30 days (Market Index)+4 ranks · +11 val+1 ranks · +5 val
Rostered21%50%
Bye1314
StatusNo injury designationNo injury designation

Expert consensus and ownership data via FantasyPros · Market Index values by LeagueLogs

Go deeper

More comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Who should I start in Week 3, Jalen Nailor or Tyler Allgeier?
Jalen Nailor. This week's consensus has Jalen Nailor at WR62 (range #60–#65) and Tyler Allgeier at RB44 (range #38–#47); on the flex board it is #121 vs #137. Projections: 7.3 vs 7.3 PPR points.
Who is better for the rest of the season, Jalen Nailor or Tyler Allgeier?
Tyler Allgeier. Rest-of-season consensus: Jalen Nailor WR82 (range #76–#91) vs Tyler Allgeier RB41 (range #34–#49). 4 of 4 FantasyPros experts who rank both have Tyler Allgeier ahead for the rest of the season.
Should I trade Jalen Nailor for Tyler Allgeier?
On the LeagueLogs Market Index (redraft PPR) Jalen Nailor is ranked #176 overall and Tyler Allgeier #133, so Tyler Allgeier carries more trade value and a one-for-one favors the side receiving him. Run the exact deal through the free AI Trade Analyzer for a verdict on your league's scoring.