Jake Tonges or Nate Boerkircher?

Who to start in Week 9, who is better for the rest of the season, and who carries more trade value — from the FantasyPros expert consensus and the LeagueLogs Market Index.

Week 9 · 2026 season · Consensus updated November 6 at 11:11 AM EST

Connect your league and an AI analyst settles debates like this one against your actual roster.

The lean

  • This week: Weekly comparison unavailable
  • Rest of season: Nate Boerkircher
  • Trade value: close to even

Some comparison data is unavailable. Read each available measure separately and check player status before deciding.

Jake TongesNate Boerkircher
Rest of seasonTE296#296–#296TE55#52–#57edge
Week 9—TE45#42–#64
Week 9 projection (PPR)0.02.9edge
Market Index value (redraft PPR)3 #343 overall2 #398 overall
Last 30 days (Market Index)-33 ranks · -27 val-11 ranks · -6 val
Rostered1%1%
Bye87
StatusIRNo injury designation

Expert consensus and ownership data via FantasyPros · Market Index values by LeagueLogs

Comparing a trade rather than a lineup choice? Check both sides of the offer with the AI Trade Analyzer, or review your Sleeper roster’s strengths and weaknesses.

Go deeper

More comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Who should I start in Week 9, Jake Tonges or Nate Boerkircher?
Weekly consensus is not available for both Jake Tonges and Nate Boerkircher on the same board. That is not a tie or a recommendation to sit either player. Check their player pages for current status and revisit when both are ranked.
Who is better for the rest of the season, Jake Tonges or Nate Boerkircher?
Nate Boerkircher. Rest-of-season consensus: Jake Tonges TE296 (range #296–#296) vs Nate Boerkircher TE55 (range #52–#57).
Should I trade Jake Tonges for Nate Boerkircher?
On the LeagueLogs Market Index (redraft PPR) Jake Tonges is ranked #343 overall and Nate Boerkircher #398, so a one-for-one is close to even. Run the exact deal through the free AI Trade Analyzer for a verdict on your league's scoring.