Jake Tonges or Jonnu Smith?
Who to start in Week 9, who is better for the rest of the season, and who carries more trade value — from the FantasyPros expert consensus and the LeagueLogs Market Index.
Week 9 · 2026 season · Consensus updated November 6 at 11:11 AM EST
Connect your league and an AI analyst settles debates like this one against your actual roster.
The lean
- This week: Weekly comparison unavailable
- Rest of season: Jonnu Smith
- Trade value: close to even
Some comparison data is unavailable. Read each available measure separately and check player status before deciding.
| Jake Tonges | Jonnu Smith | |
|---|---|---|
| Rest of season | TE296#296–#296 | TE54#50–#57edge |
| Week 9 | — | TE57#48–#65 |
| Week 9 projection (PPR) | 0.0 | 1.1edge |
| Market Index value (redraft PPR) | 3 #343 overall | 2 #351 overall |
| Last 30 days (Market Index) | -33 ranks · -27 val | -14 ranks · -10 val |
| Rostered | 1% | 1% |
| Bye | 8 | 11 |
| Status | IR | No injury designation |
Expert consensus and ownership data via FantasyPros · Market Index values by LeagueLogs
Comparing a trade rather than a lineup choice? Check both sides of the offer with the AI Trade Analyzer, or review your Sleeper roster’s strengths and weaknesses.
Go deeper
More comparisons
Frequently Asked Questions
- Who should I start in Week 9, Jake Tonges or Jonnu Smith?
- Weekly consensus is not available for both Jake Tonges and Jonnu Smith on the same board. That is not a tie or a recommendation to sit either player. Check their player pages for current status and revisit when both are ranked.
- Who is better for the rest of the season, Jake Tonges or Jonnu Smith?
- Jonnu Smith. Rest-of-season consensus: Jake Tonges TE296 (range #296–#296) vs Jonnu Smith TE54 (range #50–#57).
- Should I trade Jake Tonges for Jonnu Smith?
- On the LeagueLogs Market Index (redraft PPR) Jake Tonges is ranked #343 overall and Jonnu Smith #351, so a one-for-one is close to even. Run the exact deal through the free AI Trade Analyzer for a verdict on your league's scoring.