Jacory Croskey-Merritt or Josh Jacobs?
Who to start in Week 3, who is better for the rest of the season, and who carries more trade value — from the FantasyPros expert consensus and the LeagueLogs Market Index.
Week 3 · 2026 season · Consensus updated September 22 at 6:11 AM EDT
Connect your league and an AI analyst settles debates like this one against your actual roster.
The lean
- This week: Weekly comparison unavailable
- Rest of season: Jacory Croskey-Merritt — 2 of 4 experts
- Trade value: close to even
Some comparison data is unavailable. Read each available measure separately and check player status before deciding.
| Jacory Croskey-Merritt | Josh Jacobs | |
|---|---|---|
| Rest of season 2 of 4 experts rank Jacory Croskey-Merritt ahead · 2 rank Josh Jacobs ahead | RB36#31–#39edge | RB152#136–#164 |
| Week 3 | RB33#31–#38 | — |
| Week 3 projection (PPR) | 8.9edge | 0.0 |
| Market Index value (redraft PPR) | 7 #116 overall | 6 #140 overall |
| Last 30 days (Market Index) | 0 ranks · 0 val | -96 ranks · -1194 val |
| Rostered | 82% | 88% |
| Bye | 7 | 11 |
| Status | No injury designation | No injury designation |
Expert consensus and ownership data via FantasyPros · Market Index values by LeagueLogs
Go deeper
More comparisons
Frequently Asked Questions
- Who should I start in Week 3, Jacory Croskey-Merritt or Josh Jacobs?
- Weekly consensus is not available for both Jacory Croskey-Merritt and Josh Jacobs on the same board. That is not a tie or a recommendation to sit either player. Check their player pages for current status and revisit when both are ranked.
- Who is better for the rest of the season, Jacory Croskey-Merritt or Josh Jacobs?
- Jacory Croskey-Merritt. Rest-of-season consensus: Jacory Croskey-Merritt RB36 (range #31–#39) vs Josh Jacobs RB152 (range #136–#164). 2 of 4 FantasyPros experts who rank both have Jacory Croskey-Merritt ahead for the rest of the season.
- Should I trade Jacory Croskey-Merritt for Josh Jacobs?
- On the LeagueLogs Market Index (redraft PPR) Jacory Croskey-Merritt is ranked #116 overall and Josh Jacobs #140, so a one-for-one is close to even. Run the exact deal through the free AI Trade Analyzer for a verdict on your league's scoring.