Jacory Croskey-Merritt or Jordan Mason?
Who to start in Week 1, who is better for the rest of the season, and who carries more trade value — from the FantasyPros expert consensus and the LeagueLogs Market Index.
Week 1 · 2026 season · Consensus updated September 3 at 1:20 PM EDT
Connect your league and an AI analyst settles debates like this one against your actual roster.
The lean
- This week: Jacory Croskey-Merritt
- Rest of season: even on the consensus — 64 of 113 experts
- Trade value: close to even
The horizons disagree, which is exactly when your roster context decides it.
| Jacory Croskey-Merritt | Jordan Mason | |
|---|---|---|
| Rest of season 49 of 113 experts rank Jacory Croskey-Merritt ahead · 64 rank Jordan Mason ahead | RB38#25–#45 | RB38#26–#52 |
| Week 1 | RB39#33–#45edge | RB40#36–#43 |
| Week 1 projection (PPR) | 8.3 | 8.6 |
| Market Index value (redraft PPR) | 8 #114 overall | 7 #115 overall |
| Rostered | 79% | 77% |
| Bye | 7 | 6 |
| Status | No injury designation | No injury designation |
Expert consensus and ownership data via FantasyPros · Market Index values by LeagueLogs
Go deeper
More comparisons
Frequently Asked Questions
- Who should I start in Week 1, Jacory Croskey-Merritt or Jordan Mason?
- Jacory Croskey-Merritt. This week's consensus has Jacory Croskey-Merritt at RB39 (range #33–#45) and Jordan Mason at RB40 (range #36–#43). Projections: 8.3 vs 8.6 PPR points.
- Who is better for the rest of the season, Jacory Croskey-Merritt or Jordan Mason?
- The experts have them effectively even for the rest of the season: Jacory Croskey-Merritt RB38 (range #25–#45) vs Jordan Mason RB38 (range #26–#52). 64 of 113 FantasyPros experts who rank both have Jordan Mason ahead for the rest of the season.
- Should I trade Jacory Croskey-Merritt for Jordan Mason?
- On the LeagueLogs Market Index (redraft PPR) Jacory Croskey-Merritt is ranked #114 overall and Jordan Mason #115, so a one-for-one is close to even. Run the exact deal through the free AI Trade Analyzer for a verdict on your league's scoring.