Greg Dulcich or Woody Marks?
Who to start in Week 5, who is better for the rest of the season, and who carries more trade value — from the FantasyPros expert consensus and the LeagueLogs Market Index.
Week 5 · 2026 season · Consensus updated October 12 at 6:11 AM EDT
Connect your league and an AI analyst settles debates like this one against your actual roster.
The lean
- This week: Woody Marks
- Rest of season: Greg Dulcich — 4 of 7 experts
- Trade value: close to even
The weekly, season-long and trade-value calls differ. Choose the measure that fits your decision.
| Greg Dulcich | Woody Marks | |
|---|---|---|
| Rest of season (overall) 3 of 7 experts rank Greg Dulcich ahead · 4 rank Woody Marks ahead | #162#152–#176edge | #165#149–#184 |
| Week 5 (flex) | FLX128#92–#148 | FLX101#66–#120edge |
| Week 5 projection (PPR) | 6.7 | 8.0edge |
| Market Index value (redraft PPR) | 5 #157 overall | 5 #163 overall |
| Last 30 days (Market Index) | +60 ranks · +151 val | -31 ranks · -123 val |
| Rostered | 7% | 52% |
| Bye | 6 | 8 |
| Status | No injury designation | No injury designation |
Expert consensus and ownership data via FantasyPros · Market Index values by LeagueLogs
Go deeper
More comparisons
Frequently Asked Questions
- Who should I start in Week 5, Greg Dulcich or Woody Marks?
- Woody Marks. This week's consensus has Greg Dulcich at TE28 (range #17–#33) and Woody Marks at RB34 (range #27–#37); on the flex board it is #128 vs #101. Projections: 6.7 vs 8.0 PPR points.
- Who is better for the rest of the season, Greg Dulcich or Woody Marks?
- Greg Dulcich. Rest-of-season consensus: Greg Dulcich TE27 (range #24–#29) vs Woody Marks RB41 (range #38–#46). 4 of 7 FantasyPros experts who rank both have Woody Marks ahead for the rest of the season.
- Should I trade Greg Dulcich for Woody Marks?
- On the LeagueLogs Market Index (redraft PPR) Greg Dulcich is ranked #157 overall and Woody Marks #163, so a one-for-one is close to even. Run the exact deal through the free AI Trade Analyzer for a verdict on your league's scoring.