Greg Dulcich or Jerry Jeudy?
Who to start in Week 3, who is better for the rest of the season, and who carries more trade value — from the FantasyPros expert consensus and the LeagueLogs Market Index.
Week 3 · 2026 season · Consensus updated September 22 at 6:11 AM EDT
Connect your league and an AI analyst settles debates like this one against your actual roster.
The lean
- This week: Greg Dulcich
- Rest of season: Greg Dulcich — 2 of 4 experts
- Trade value: close to even
At least one measure is close to even. Your scoring, lineup and matchup can help separate them.
| Greg Dulcich | Jerry Jeudy | |
|---|---|---|
| Rest of season (overall) 2 of 4 experts rank Greg Dulcich ahead · 2 rank Jerry Jeudy ahead | #158#148–#176edge | #176#131–#234 |
| Week 3 (flex) | FLX157#155–#161edge | FLX161#157–#170 |
| Week 3 projection (PPR) | 6.7 | 7.3 |
| Market Index value (redraft PPR) | 4 #215 overall | 5 #166 overall |
| Last 30 days (Market Index) | -12 ranks · -24 val | -8 ranks · -26 val |
| Rostered | 8% | 19% |
| Bye | 6 | 11 |
| Status | No injury designation | No injury designation |
Expert consensus and ownership data via FantasyPros · Market Index values by LeagueLogs
Go deeper
More comparisons
Frequently Asked Questions
- Who should I start in Week 3, Greg Dulcich or Jerry Jeudy?
- Greg Dulcich. This week's consensus has Greg Dulcich at TE30 (range #29–#31) and Jerry Jeudy at WR79 (range #78–#83); on the flex board it is #157 vs #161. Projections: 6.7 vs 7.3 PPR points.
- Who is better for the rest of the season, Greg Dulcich or Jerry Jeudy?
- Greg Dulcich. Rest-of-season consensus: Greg Dulcich TE25 (range #22–#29) vs Jerry Jeudy WR74 (range #60–#87). 2 of 4 FantasyPros experts who rank both have Greg Dulcich ahead for the rest of the season.
- Should I trade Greg Dulcich for Jerry Jeudy?
- On the LeagueLogs Market Index (redraft PPR) Greg Dulcich is ranked #215 overall and Jerry Jeudy #166, so a one-for-one is close to even. Run the exact deal through the free AI Trade Analyzer for a verdict on your league's scoring.