George Holani or Kimani Vidal?
Who to start in Week 5, who is better for the rest of the season, and who carries more trade value — from the FantasyPros expert consensus and the LeagueLogs Market Index.
Week 5 · 2026 season · Consensus updated October 12 at 12:11 AM EDT
Connect your league and an AI analyst settles debates like this one against your actual roster.
The lean
- This week: George Holani
- Rest of season: Kimani Vidal — 5 of 7 experts
- Trade value: close to even
The weekly, season-long and trade-value calls differ. Choose the measure that fits your decision.
| George Holani | Kimani Vidal | |
|---|---|---|
| Rest of season 2 of 7 experts rank George Holani ahead · 5 rank Kimani Vidal ahead | RB68#64–#76 | RB64#62–#67edge |
| Week 5 | RB42#35–#51edge | RB53#48–#57 |
| Week 5 projection (PPR) | 6.8edge | 5.8 |
| Market Index value (redraft PPR) | 3 #296 overall | 3 #279 overall |
| Last 30 days (Market Index) | -64 ranks · -82 val | -78 ranks · -121 val |
| Rostered | 7% | 3% |
| Bye | 11 | 7 |
| Status | QUESTIONABLE (Ribs) · LIMIT → LIMIT → LIMIT · 0.8205% to play | No injury designation |
Expert consensus and ownership data via FantasyPros · Market Index values by LeagueLogs
Go deeper
More comparisons
Frequently Asked Questions
- Who should I start in Week 5, George Holani or Kimani Vidal?
- George Holani. This week's consensus has George Holani at RB42 (range #35–#51) and Kimani Vidal at RB53 (range #48–#57). Projections: 6.8 vs 5.8 PPR points.
- Who is better for the rest of the season, George Holani or Kimani Vidal?
- Kimani Vidal. Rest-of-season consensus: George Holani RB68 (range #64–#76) vs Kimani Vidal RB64 (range #62–#67). 5 of 7 FantasyPros experts who rank both have Kimani Vidal ahead for the rest of the season.
- Should I trade George Holani for Kimani Vidal?
- On the LeagueLogs Market Index (redraft PPR) George Holani is ranked #296 overall and Kimani Vidal #279, so a one-for-one is close to even. Run the exact deal through the free AI Trade Analyzer for a verdict on your league's scoring.