Emanuel Wilson or Tyler Allgeier?
Who to start in Week 6, who is better for the rest of the season, and who carries more trade value — from the FantasyPros expert consensus and the LeagueLogs Market Index.
Week 6 · 2026 season · Consensus updated October 15 at 12:11 AM EDT
Connect your league and an AI analyst settles debates like this one against your actual roster.
The lean
- This week: Emanuel Wilson
- Rest of season: Emanuel Wilson — 5 of 5 experts
- Trade value: close to even
At least one measure is close to even. Your scoring, lineup and matchup can help separate them.
| Emanuel Wilson | Tyler Allgeier | |
|---|---|---|
| Rest of season 5 of 5 experts rank Emanuel Wilson ahead · 0 rank Tyler Allgeier ahead | RB37#33–#43edge | RB47#42–#53 |
| Week 6 | RB17#12–#23edge | RB36#33–#38 |
| Week 6 projection (PPR) | 12.1edge | 6.5 |
| Market Index value (redraft PPR) | 6 #147 overall | 5 #180 overall |
| Last 30 days (Market Index) | +111 ranks · +252 val | -47 ranks · -168 val |
| Rostered | 84% | 46% |
| Bye | 11 | 14 |
| Status | No injury designation | No injury designation |
Expert consensus and ownership data via FantasyPros · Market Index values by LeagueLogs
Go deeper
More comparisons
Frequently Asked Questions
- Who should I start in Week 6, Emanuel Wilson or Tyler Allgeier?
- Emanuel Wilson. This week's consensus has Emanuel Wilson at RB17 (range #12–#23) and Tyler Allgeier at RB36 (range #33–#38). Projections: 12.1 vs 6.5 PPR points.
- Who is better for the rest of the season, Emanuel Wilson or Tyler Allgeier?
- Emanuel Wilson. Rest-of-season consensus: Emanuel Wilson RB37 (range #33–#43) vs Tyler Allgeier RB47 (range #42–#53). 5 of 5 FantasyPros experts who rank both have Emanuel Wilson ahead for the rest of the season.
- Should I trade Emanuel Wilson for Tyler Allgeier?
- On the LeagueLogs Market Index (redraft PPR) Emanuel Wilson is ranked #147 overall and Tyler Allgeier #180, so a one-for-one is close to even. Run the exact deal through the free AI Trade Analyzer for a verdict on your league's scoring.