Eli Raridon or Theo Johnson?

Who to start in Week 9, who is better for the rest of the season, and who carries more trade value — from the FantasyPros expert consensus and the LeagueLogs Market Index.

Week 9 · 2026 season · Consensus updated November 6 at 11:11 AM EST

Connect your league and an AI analyst settles debates like this one against your actual roster.

The lean

  • This week: Eli Raridon
  • Rest of season: Eli Raridon — 4 of 4 experts
  • Trade value: close to even

At least one measure is close to even. Your scoring, lineup and matchup can help separate them.

Eli RaridonTheo Johnson
Rest of season
4 of 4 experts rank Eli Raridon ahead · 0 rank Theo Johnson ahead
TE32#25–#38edgeTE45#40–#49
Week 9TE21#13–#26edgeTE52#45–#71
Week 9 projection (PPR)8.7edge3.1
Market Index value (redraft PPR)4 #213 overall3 #333 overall
Last 30 days (Market Index)+74 ranks · +105 val-47 ranks · -43 val
Rostered3%1%
Bye118
StatusNo injury designationNo injury designation

Expert consensus and ownership data via FantasyPros · Market Index values by LeagueLogs

Comparing a trade rather than a lineup choice? Check both sides of the offer with the AI Trade Analyzer, or review your Sleeper roster’s strengths and weaknesses.

Go deeper

More comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Who should I start in Week 9, Eli Raridon or Theo Johnson?
Eli Raridon. This week's consensus has Eli Raridon at TE21 (range #13–#26) and Theo Johnson at TE52 (range #45–#71). Projections: 8.7 vs 3.1 PPR points.
Who is better for the rest of the season, Eli Raridon or Theo Johnson?
Eli Raridon. Rest-of-season consensus: Eli Raridon TE32 (range #25–#38) vs Theo Johnson TE45 (range #40–#49). 4 of 4 FantasyPros experts who rank both have Eli Raridon ahead for the rest of the season.
Should I trade Eli Raridon for Theo Johnson?
On the LeagueLogs Market Index (redraft PPR) Eli Raridon is ranked #213 overall and Theo Johnson #333, so a one-for-one is close to even. Run the exact deal through the free AI Trade Analyzer for a verdict on your league's scoring.