DK Metcalf or Quentin Johnston?
Who to start in Week 3, who is better for the rest of the season, and who carries more trade value — from the FantasyPros expert consensus and the LeagueLogs Market Index.
Week 3 · 2026 season · Consensus updated September 22 at 6:11 AM EDT
Connect your league and an AI analyst settles debates like this one against your actual roster.
The lean
- This week: DK Metcalf
- Rest of season: DK Metcalf — 4 of 4 experts
- Trade value: DK Metcalf
All three measures favor the same player. Your scoring, lineup and matchup still matter.
| DK Metcalf | Quentin Johnston | |
|---|---|---|
| Rest of season 4 of 4 experts rank DK Metcalf ahead · 0 rank Quentin Johnston ahead | WR36#32–#40edge | WR44#43–#46 |
| Week 3 | WR26#21–#32edge | WR40#37–#48 |
| Week 3 projection (PPR) | 11.3edge | 9.8 |
| Market Index value (redraft PPR) | 11 #75 overalledge | 9 #90 overall |
| Last 30 days (Market Index) | +2 ranks · +28 val | +4 ranks · +38 val |
| Rostered | 92% | 77% |
| Bye | 9 | 7 |
| Status | No injury designation | No injury designation |
Expert consensus and ownership data via FantasyPros · Market Index values by LeagueLogs
Go deeper
More comparisons
Frequently Asked Questions
- Who should I start in Week 3, DK Metcalf or Quentin Johnston?
- DK Metcalf. This week's consensus has DK Metcalf at WR26 (range #21–#32) and Quentin Johnston at WR40 (range #37–#48). Projections: 11.3 vs 9.8 PPR points.
- Who is better for the rest of the season, DK Metcalf or Quentin Johnston?
- DK Metcalf. Rest-of-season consensus: DK Metcalf WR36 (range #32–#40) vs Quentin Johnston WR44 (range #43–#46). 4 of 4 FantasyPros experts who rank both have DK Metcalf ahead for the rest of the season.
- Should I trade DK Metcalf for Quentin Johnston?
- On the LeagueLogs Market Index (redraft PPR) DK Metcalf is ranked #75 overall and Quentin Johnston #90, so DK Metcalf carries more trade value and a one-for-one favors the side receiving him. Run the exact deal through the free AI Trade Analyzer for a verdict on your league's scoring.