Devin Singletary or Isaiah Davis?

Who to start in Week 3, who is better for the rest of the season, and who carries more trade value — from the FantasyPros expert consensus and the LeagueLogs Market Index.

Week 3 · 2026 season · Consensus updated September 22 at 6:11 AM EDT

Connect your league and an AI analyst settles debates like this one against your actual roster.

The lean

  • This week: Weekly comparison unavailable
  • Rest of season: Devin Singletary2 of 3 experts
  • Trade value: close to even

Some comparison data is unavailable. Read each available measure separately and check player status before deciding.

Devin SingletaryIsaiah Davis
Rest of season
2 of 3 experts rank Devin Singletary ahead · 1 rank Isaiah Davis ahead
RB72#63–#80edgeRB309#273–#358
Week 3RB51#49–#55
Week 3 projection (PPR)5.5edge1.8
Market Index value (redraft PPR)3 #319 overall3 #276 overall
Last 30 days (Market Index)+33 ranks · +26 val-16 ranks · -19 val
Rostered19%1%
Bye813
StatusNo injury designationNo injury designation

Expert consensus and ownership data via FantasyPros · Market Index values by LeagueLogs

Go deeper

More comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Who should I start in Week 3, Devin Singletary or Isaiah Davis?
Weekly consensus is not available for both Devin Singletary and Isaiah Davis on the same board. That is not a tie or a recommendation to sit either player. Check their player pages for current status and revisit when both are ranked.
Who is better for the rest of the season, Devin Singletary or Isaiah Davis?
Devin Singletary. Rest-of-season consensus: Devin Singletary RB72 (range #63–#80) vs Isaiah Davis RB309 (range #273–#358). 2 of 3 FantasyPros experts who rank both have Devin Singletary ahead for the rest of the season.
Should I trade Devin Singletary for Isaiah Davis?
On the LeagueLogs Market Index (redraft PPR) Devin Singletary is ranked #319 overall and Isaiah Davis #276, so a one-for-one is close to even. Run the exact deal through the free AI Trade Analyzer for a verdict on your league's scoring.