Denzel Boston or Wan'Dale Robinson?

Who to start in Week 3, who is better for the rest of the season, and who carries more trade value — from the FantasyPros expert consensus and the LeagueLogs Market Index.

Week 3 · 2026 season · Consensus updated September 22 at 6:11 AM EDT

Connect your league and an AI analyst settles debates like this one against your actual roster.

The lean

  • This week: Denzel Boston
  • Rest of season: even on the consensus2 of 4 experts
  • Trade value: Wan'Dale Robinson

The weekly, season-long and trade-value calls differ. Choose the measure that fits your decision.

Denzel BostonWan'Dale Robinson
Rest of season
2 of 4 experts rank Denzel Boston ahead · 2 rank Wan'Dale Robinson ahead
WR41#34–#51WR41#33–#47
Week 3WR46#39–#52edgeWR52#51–#52
Week 3 projection (PPR)9.79.5
Market Index value (redraft PPR)6 #145 overall10 #88 overalledge
Last 30 days (Market Index)-1 ranks · -4 val-3 ranks · -33 val
Rostered36%70%
Bye119
StatusNo injury designationNo injury designation

Expert consensus and ownership data via FantasyPros · Market Index values by LeagueLogs

Go deeper

More comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Who should I start in Week 3, Denzel Boston or Wan'Dale Robinson?
Denzel Boston. This week's consensus has Denzel Boston at WR46 (range #39–#52) and Wan'Dale Robinson at WR52 (range #51–#52). Projections: 9.7 vs 9.5 PPR points.
Who is better for the rest of the season, Denzel Boston or Wan'Dale Robinson?
The experts have them effectively even for the rest of the season: Denzel Boston WR41 (range #34–#51) vs Wan'Dale Robinson WR41 (range #33–#47). 2 of 4 FantasyPros experts who rank both have Denzel Boston ahead for the rest of the season.
Should I trade Denzel Boston for Wan'Dale Robinson?
On the LeagueLogs Market Index (redraft PPR) Denzel Boston is ranked #145 overall and Wan'Dale Robinson #88, so Wan'Dale Robinson carries more trade value and a one-for-one favors the side receiving him. Run the exact deal through the free AI Trade Analyzer for a verdict on your league's scoring.