Deebo Samuel Sr. or Malik Washington?

Who to start in Week 5, who is better for the rest of the season, and who carries more trade value — from the FantasyPros expert consensus and the LeagueLogs Market Index.

Week 5 · 2026 season · Consensus updated October 7 at 6:11 PM EDT

Connect your league and an AI analyst settles debates like this one against your actual roster.

The lean

  • This week: Deebo Samuel Sr.
  • Rest of season: Deebo Samuel Sr. — 6 of 6 experts
  • Trade value: Deebo Samuel Sr.

All three measures favor the same player. Your scoring, lineup and matchup still matter.

Deebo Samuel Sr.Malik Washington
Rest of season
6 of 6 experts rank Deebo Samuel Sr. ahead · 0 rank Malik Washington ahead
WR36#33–#39edgeWR61#45–#68
Week 5WR29#26–#31edgeWR31#25–#35
Week 5 projection (PPR)10.710.8
Market Index value (redraft PPR)12 #72 overalledge6 #142 overall
Last 30 days (Market Index)+67 ranks · +544 val+41 ranks · +134 val
Rostered80%37%
Bye86
StatusNo injury designationNo injury designation

Expert consensus and ownership data via FantasyPros · Market Index values by LeagueLogs

Go deeper

More comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Who should I start in Week 5, Deebo Samuel Sr. or Malik Washington?
Deebo Samuel Sr.. This week's consensus has Deebo Samuel Sr. at WR29 (range #26–#31) and Malik Washington at WR31 (range #25–#35). Projections: 10.7 vs 10.8 PPR points.
Who is better for the rest of the season, Deebo Samuel Sr. or Malik Washington?
Deebo Samuel Sr.. Rest-of-season consensus: Deebo Samuel Sr. WR36 (range #33–#39) vs Malik Washington WR61 (range #45–#68). 6 of 6 FantasyPros experts who rank both have Deebo Samuel Sr. ahead for the rest of the season.
Should I trade Deebo Samuel Sr. for Malik Washington?
On the LeagueLogs Market Index (redraft PPR) Deebo Samuel Sr. is ranked #72 overall and Malik Washington #142, so Deebo Samuel Sr. carries more trade value and a one-for-one favors the side receiving him. Run the exact deal through the free AI Trade Analyzer for a verdict on your league's scoring.