David Montgomery or Omarion Hampton?

Who to start in Week 5, who is better for the rest of the season, and who carries more trade value — from the FantasyPros expert consensus and the LeagueLogs Market Index.

Week 5 · 2026 season · Consensus updated October 12 at 12:11 AM EDT

Connect your league and an AI analyst settles debates like this one against your actual roster.

The lean

  • This week: David Montgomery
  • Rest of season: Omarion Hampton — 8 of 8 experts
  • Trade value: Omarion Hampton

The weekly, season-long and trade-value calls differ. Choose the measure that fits your decision.

David MontgomeryOmarion Hampton
Rest of season
0 of 8 experts rank David Montgomery ahead · 8 rank Omarion Hampton ahead
RB24#19–#29RB19#15–#23edge
Week 5RB23#20–#28edgeRB26#15–#32
Week 5 projection (PPR)13.0edge9.9
Market Index value (redraft PPR)12 #69 overall18 #43 overalledge
Last 30 days (Market Index)-10 ranks · -186 val-18 ranks · -1023 val
Rostered96%98%
Bye87
StatusNo injury designationNo injury designation

Expert consensus and ownership data via FantasyPros · Market Index values by LeagueLogs

Go deeper

More comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Who should I start in Week 5, David Montgomery or Omarion Hampton?
David Montgomery. This week's consensus has David Montgomery at RB23 (range #20–#28) and Omarion Hampton at RB26 (range #15–#32). Projections: 13.0 vs 9.9 PPR points.
Who is better for the rest of the season, David Montgomery or Omarion Hampton?
Omarion Hampton. Rest-of-season consensus: David Montgomery RB24 (range #19–#29) vs Omarion Hampton RB19 (range #15–#23). 8 of 8 FantasyPros experts who rank both have Omarion Hampton ahead for the rest of the season.
Should I trade David Montgomery for Omarion Hampton?
On the LeagueLogs Market Index (redraft PPR) David Montgomery is ranked #69 overall and Omarion Hampton #43, so Omarion Hampton carries more trade value and a one-for-one favors the side receiving him. Run the exact deal through the free AI Trade Analyzer for a verdict on your league's scoring.