Daniel Jones or Kyler Murray?
Who to start in Week 3, who is better for the rest of the season, and who carries more trade value — from the FantasyPros expert consensus and the LeagueLogs Market Index.
Week 3 · 2026 season · Consensus updated September 22 at 6:11 AM EDT
Connect your league and an AI analyst settles debates like this one against your actual roster.
The lean
- This week: Kyler Murray
- Rest of season: Kyler Murray — 4 of 4 experts
- Trade value: Kyler Murray
All three measures favor the same player. Your scoring, lineup and matchup still matter.
| Daniel Jones | Kyler Murray | |
|---|---|---|
| Rest of season 0 of 4 experts rank Daniel Jones ahead · 4 rank Kyler Murray ahead | QB25#23–#26 | QB21#20–#23edge |
| Week 3 | QB27#26–#28 | QB14#11–#16edge |
| Week 3 projection (PPR) | 14.9 | 16.6edge |
| Market Index value (redraft PPR) | 6 #142 overall | 8 #110 overalledge |
| Last 30 days (Market Index) | +3 ranks · +12 val | +1 ranks · +7 val |
| Rostered | 26% | 57% |
| Bye | 13 | 6 |
| Status | No injury designation | No injury designation |
Expert consensus and ownership data via FantasyPros · Market Index values by LeagueLogs
Go deeper
More comparisons
Frequently Asked Questions
- Who should I start in Week 3, Daniel Jones or Kyler Murray?
- Kyler Murray. This week's consensus has Daniel Jones at QB27 (range #26–#28) and Kyler Murray at QB14 (range #11–#16). Projections: 14.9 vs 16.6 PPR points.
- Who is better for the rest of the season, Daniel Jones or Kyler Murray?
- Kyler Murray. Rest-of-season consensus: Daniel Jones QB25 (range #23–#26) vs Kyler Murray QB21 (range #20–#23). 4 of 4 FantasyPros experts who rank both have Kyler Murray ahead for the rest of the season.
- Should I trade Daniel Jones for Kyler Murray?
- On the LeagueLogs Market Index (redraft PPR) Daniel Jones is ranked #142 overall and Kyler Murray #110, so Kyler Murray carries more trade value and a one-for-one favors the side receiving him. Run the exact deal through the free AI Trade Analyzer for a verdict on your league's scoring.