Dalton Kincaid or Trey McBride?
Who to start in Week 5, who is better for the rest of the season, and who carries more trade value — from the FantasyPros expert consensus and the LeagueLogs Market Index.
Week 5 · 2026 season · Consensus updated October 7 at 6:11 PM EDT
Connect your league and an AI analyst settles debates like this one against your actual roster.
The lean
- This week: Trey McBride
- Rest of season: Trey McBride — 6 of 6 experts
- Trade value: Trey McBride
All three measures favor the same player. Your scoring, lineup and matchup still matter.
| Dalton Kincaid | Trey McBride | |
|---|---|---|
| Rest of season 0 of 6 experts rank Dalton Kincaid ahead · 6 rank Trey McBride ahead | TE6#3–#10 | TE2#1–#2edge |
| Week 5 | TE7#4–#12 | TE1#1–#1edge |
| Week 5 projection (PPR) | 10.3 | 18.3edge |
| Market Index value (redraft PPR) | 10 #88 overall | 26 #29 overalledge |
| Last 30 days (Market Index) | +25 ranks · +205 val | -12 ranks · -1227 val |
| Rostered | 94% | 100% |
| Bye | 7 | 14 |
| Status | No injury designation | No injury designation |
Expert consensus and ownership data via FantasyPros · Market Index values by LeagueLogs
Go deeper
More comparisons
Frequently Asked Questions
- Who should I start in Week 5, Dalton Kincaid or Trey McBride?
- Trey McBride. This week's consensus has Dalton Kincaid at TE7 (range #4–#12) and Trey McBride at TE1 (range #1–#1). Projections: 10.3 vs 18.3 PPR points.
- Who is better for the rest of the season, Dalton Kincaid or Trey McBride?
- Trey McBride. Rest-of-season consensus: Dalton Kincaid TE6 (range #3–#10) vs Trey McBride TE2 (range #1–#2). 6 of 6 FantasyPros experts who rank both have Trey McBride ahead for the rest of the season.
- Should I trade Dalton Kincaid for Trey McBride?
- On the LeagueLogs Market Index (redraft PPR) Dalton Kincaid is ranked #88 overall and Trey McBride #29, so Trey McBride carries more trade value and a one-for-one favors the side receiving him. Run the exact deal through the free AI Trade Analyzer for a verdict on your league's scoring.