Dallas Goedert or Noah Gray?
Who to start in Week 6, who is better for the rest of the season, and who carries more trade value — from the FantasyPros expert consensus and the LeagueLogs Market Index.
Week 6 · 2026 season · Consensus updated October 15 at 6:11 PM EDT
Connect your league and an AI analyst settles debates like this one against your actual roster.
The lean
- This week: Dallas Goedert
- Rest of season: Dallas Goedert — 2 of 2 experts
- Trade value: Dallas Goedert
All three measures favor the same player. Your scoring, lineup and matchup still matter.
| Dallas Goedert | Noah Gray | |
|---|---|---|
| Rest of season 2 of 2 experts rank Dallas Goedert ahead · 0 rank Noah Gray ahead | TE13#11–#15edge | TE53#46–#59 |
| Week 6 | TE10#8–#13edge | TE41#35–#62 |
| Week 6 projection (PPR) | 10.4edge | 3.7 |
| Market Index value (redraft PPR) | 7 #116 overalledge | 2 #366 overall |
| Last 30 days (Market Index) | +2 ranks · +12 val | +56 ranks · +32 val |
| Rostered | 79% | 1% |
| Bye | 10 | 5 |
| Status | No injury designation | No injury designation |
Expert consensus and ownership data via FantasyPros · Market Index values by LeagueLogs
Go deeper
More comparisons
Frequently Asked Questions
- Who should I start in Week 6, Dallas Goedert or Noah Gray?
- Dallas Goedert. This week's consensus has Dallas Goedert at TE10 (range #8–#13) and Noah Gray at TE41 (range #35–#62). Projections: 10.4 vs 3.7 PPR points.
- Who is better for the rest of the season, Dallas Goedert or Noah Gray?
- Dallas Goedert. Rest-of-season consensus: Dallas Goedert TE13 (range #11–#15) vs Noah Gray TE53 (range #46–#59). 2 of 2 FantasyPros experts who rank both have Dallas Goedert ahead for the rest of the season.
- Should I trade Dallas Goedert for Noah Gray?
- On the LeagueLogs Market Index (redraft PPR) Dallas Goedert is ranked #116 overall and Noah Gray #366, so Dallas Goedert carries more trade value and a one-for-one favors the side receiving him. Run the exact deal through the free AI Trade Analyzer for a verdict on your league's scoring.