Colston Loveland or Rome Odunze?

Who to start in Week 3, who is better for the rest of the season, and who carries more trade value — from the FantasyPros expert consensus and the LeagueLogs Market Index.

Week 3 · 2026 season · Consensus updated September 22 at 6:11 AM EDT

Connect your league and an AI analyst settles debates like this one against your actual roster.

The lean

  • This week: Rome Odunze
  • Rest of season: Colston Loveland3 of 4 experts
  • Trade value: Colston Loveland

The weekly, season-long and trade-value calls differ. Choose the measure that fits your decision.

Colston LovelandRome Odunze
Rest of season (overall)
3 of 4 experts rank Colston Loveland ahead · 1 rank Rome Odunze ahead
#61#43–#86edge#67#60–#77
Week 3 (flex)FLX78#70–#92FLX77#64–#81edge
Week 3 projection (PPR)9.69.4
Market Index value (redraft PPR)24 #32 overalledge13 #62 overall
Last 30 days (Market Index)+5 ranks · +266 val-6 ranks · -129 val
Rostered99%94%
Bye1010
StatusNo injury designationNo injury designation

Expert consensus and ownership data via FantasyPros · Market Index values by LeagueLogs

Go deeper

More comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Who should I start in Week 3, Colston Loveland or Rome Odunze?
Rome Odunze. This week's consensus has Colston Loveland at TE12 (range #11–#14) and Rome Odunze at WR38 (range #31–#40); on the flex board it is #78 vs #77. Projections: 9.6 vs 9.4 PPR points.
Who is better for the rest of the season, Colston Loveland or Rome Odunze?
Colston Loveland. Rest-of-season consensus: Colston Loveland TE4 (range #3–#5) vs Rome Odunze WR34 (range #29–#40). 3 of 4 FantasyPros experts who rank both have Colston Loveland ahead for the rest of the season.
Should I trade Colston Loveland for Rome Odunze?
On the LeagueLogs Market Index (redraft PPR) Colston Loveland is ranked #32 overall and Rome Odunze #62, so Colston Loveland carries more trade value and a one-for-one favors the side receiving him. Run the exact deal through the free AI Trade Analyzer for a verdict on your league's scoring.