Colston Loveland or Juwan Johnson?
Who to start in Week 6, who is better for the rest of the season, and who carries more trade value — from the FantasyPros expert consensus and the LeagueLogs Market Index.
Week 6 · 2026 season · Consensus updated October 13 at 6:11 AM EDT
Connect your league and an AI analyst settles debates like this one against your actual roster.
The lean
- This week: Juwan Johnson
- Rest of season: Juwan Johnson — 1 of 2 experts
- Trade value: close to even
At least one measure is close to even. Your scoring, lineup and matchup can help separate them.
| Colston Loveland | Juwan Johnson | |
|---|---|---|
| Rest of season 1 of 2 experts rank Colston Loveland ahead · 1 rank Juwan Johnson ahead | TE12#10–#14 | TE11#10–#11edge |
| Week 6 | TE13#10–#20 | TE9#8–#11edge |
| Week 6 projection (PPR) | 9.7 | 10.9edge |
| Market Index value (redraft PPR) | 8 #103 overall | 8 #112 overall |
| Last 30 days (Market Index) | -71 ranks · -1533 val | +17 ranks · +99 val |
| Rostered | 93% | 70% |
| Bye | 10 | 8 |
| Status | No injury designation | No injury designation |
Expert consensus and ownership data via FantasyPros · Market Index values by LeagueLogs
Go deeper
More comparisons
Frequently Asked Questions
- Who should I start in Week 6, Colston Loveland or Juwan Johnson?
- Juwan Johnson. This week's consensus has Colston Loveland at TE13 (range #10–#20) and Juwan Johnson at TE9 (range #8–#11). Projections: 9.7 vs 10.9 PPR points.
- Who is better for the rest of the season, Colston Loveland or Juwan Johnson?
- Juwan Johnson. Rest-of-season consensus: Colston Loveland TE12 (range #10–#14) vs Juwan Johnson TE11 (range #10–#11). 1 of 2 FantasyPros experts who rank both have Colston Loveland ahead for the rest of the season.
- Should I trade Colston Loveland for Juwan Johnson?
- On the LeagueLogs Market Index (redraft PPR) Colston Loveland is ranked #103 overall and Juwan Johnson #112, so a one-for-one is close to even. Run the exact deal through the free AI Trade Analyzer for a verdict on your league's scoring.